Pharmacodynamic modeling of chemotherapeutic effects: application of a transit compartment model to characterize methotrexate effects in vitro
- PMID: 12646013
- PMCID: PMC2751331
- DOI: 10.1208/ps040442
Pharmacodynamic modeling of chemotherapeutic effects: application of a transit compartment model to characterize methotrexate effects in vitro
Abstract
The time course of chemotherapeutic effect is often delayed relative to the time course of chemotherapeutic exposure. In many cases, this delay is difficult to characterize mathematically through the use of standard pharmacodynamic models. In the present work, we investigated the relationship between methotrexate (MTX) exposure and the time course of MTX effects on tumor cell growth in culture. Two cancer cell lines, Ehrlich ascites cells and sarcoma 180 cells, were exposed for 24 hours to MTX concentrations that varied more than 700-fold (0.19-140 micro g/mL). Viable cells were counted on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 20, 22, and 24 for Ehrlich ascites cells and on days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17, 19, and 21 for sarcoma 180 cells, through the use of a tetrazolium assay. Although MTX was removed 24 hours after application, cell numbers reached nadir values more than 100 hours after MTX exposure. Data from each cell line were fitted to 3 pharmacodynamic models of chemotherapeutic cell killing: a cell cycle phase-specific model, a phase-nonspecific model, and a transit compartment model (based on the general model recently reported by Mager and Jusko, Clin Pharmacol Ther. 70:210-216, 2001). The transit compartment model captured the data much more accurately than the standard pharmacodynamic models, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.86 to 0.999. This report shows the successful application of a transit compartment model for characterization of the complex time course of chemotherapeutic effects; such models may be very useful in the development of optimization strategies for cancer chemotherapy.
Similar articles
-
Effect of methotrexate on the intracellular phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate level and glucose transport of Ehrlich ascites tumor cells in vitro.Oncology. 1996 Jan-Feb;53(1):27-30. doi: 10.1159/000227530. Oncology. 1996. PMID: 8570127
-
Prevention by thymidine against toxicity and glucose uptake inhibition of methotrexate on cultured Ehrlich ascites tumour cells.Pharmacol Res Commun. 1986 Aug;18(8):759-67. doi: 10.1016/0031-6989(86)90117-7. Pharmacol Res Commun. 1986. PMID: 3763678
-
Trehalose enhances the antitumor potential of methotrexate against mice bearing Ehrlich ascites carcinoma.Biomed Pharmacother. 2017 Aug;92:870-878. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jun 6. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017. PMID: 28599251
-
[In vitro cytotoxicity of methotrexate].Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi. 1984 Jul;58(7):677-84. Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi. 1984. PMID: 6334123 Japanese.
-
Propolis Potentiates Methotrexate Anticancer Mechanism and Reduces its Toxic Effects.Nutr Cancer. 2020;72(3):460-480. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2019.1640884. Epub 2019 Jul 18. Nutr Cancer. 2020. PMID: 31318622
Cited by
-
On translation of antibody drug conjugates efficacy from mouse experimental tumors to the clinic: a PK/PD approach.J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2013 Oct;40(5):557-71. doi: 10.1007/s10928-013-9329-x. Epub 2013 Aug 10. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2013. PMID: 23933716
-
A distributed delay approach for modeling delayed outcomes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics studies.J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2018 Apr;45(2):285-308. doi: 10.1007/s10928-018-9570-4. Epub 2018 Jan 24. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2018. PMID: 29368268
-
Cell Signaling Model Connects Vorinostat Pharmacokinetics and Tumor Growth Response in Multiple Myeloma Xenografts.CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2017 Nov;6(11):756-764. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12246. Epub 2017 Oct 17. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2017. PMID: 29045072 Free PMC article.
-
Model-based assessment of erlotinib effect in vitro measured by real-time cell analysis.J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2015 Jun;42(3):275-85. doi: 10.1007/s10928-015-9415-3. Epub 2015 Mar 31. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2015. PMID: 25822652
-
Leveraging Mathematical Modeling to Quantify Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Pathways: Equivalent Dose Metric.Front Physiol. 2019 May 22;10:616. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00616. eCollection 2019. Front Physiol. 2019. PMID: 31178753 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Aisner J, Echo DA, Whitacre M, Wiernik PH. A phase I trial of continuous infusion VP16-213 (etoposide) Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1982;7:157–160. - PubMed
-
- Frei ED, Bickers JN, Hewlett JS, et al. Dose schedule and antitumor studies of arabinosyl cytosine (NSC 63878) Cancer Res. 1969;29:1325–1332. - PubMed
-
- Wiernik PH, Schwartz EL, Strauman JJ, et al. Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of taxol. Cancer Res. 1987;47:2486–2493. - PubMed
-
- O Dwyer PJ, Hudes GR, Walczak J, et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the novel platinum analogue CI-973 on a 5-daily dose schedule. Cancer Res. 1992;52:6746–6753. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources