Comment in

• Challenging the tyranny of impact factors.

  Colquhoun D. Colquhoun D. Nature. 2003 May 29;423(6939):479; discussion 480. doi: 10.1038/423479a. Nature. 2003. PMID: 12774093 No abstract available.
• Editors are meant to be judges, not postmen.

  Michell B. Michell B. Nature. 2003 May 29;423(6939):479-80; discussion 480. doi: 10.1038/423479b. Nature. 2003. PMID: 12774094 No abstract available.
• The system rewards a dishonest approach.

  Brookfield J. Brookfield J. Nature. 2003 May 29;423(6939):480; discussion 480. doi: 10.1038/423480a. Nature. 2003. PMID: 12774095 No abstract available.
• Impact factors aren't top journals' sole attraction.

  Törnqvist TE. Törnqvist TE. Nature. 2003 May 29;423(6939):480. doi: 10.1038/423480b. Nature. 2003. PMID: 12774096 No abstract available.
• Disruption to science in developing countries.

  Barcinski MA. Barcinski MA. Nature. 2003 May 29;423(6939):480. doi: 10.1038/423480c. Nature. 2003. PMID: 12774097 No abstract available.
• Impact factors: target the funding bodies.

  Insall R. Insall R. Nature. 2003 Jun 5;423(6940):585. doi: 10.1038/423585b. Nature. 2003. PMID: 12789312 No abstract available.
• Impact factors: a tool of the sterile audit culture.

  Tuck A. Tuck A. Nature. 2003 Jul 3;424(6944):14. doi: 10.1038/424014a. Nature. 2003. PMID: 12840730 No abstract available.
• Impact factors: letting everyone have their say.

  Cobb M. Cobb M. Nature. 2003 Jul 31;424(6948):487. doi: 10.1038/424487b. Nature. 2003. PMID: 12891328 No abstract available.
• Impact factors reward and promote excellence.

  Lomnicki A. Lomnicki A. Nature. 2003 Jul 31;424(6948):487. doi: 10.1038/424487a. Nature. 2003. PMID: 12891329 No abstract available.