Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Mar;18(3):175-81.
doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20512.x.

Patient satisfaction in women's clinics versus traditional primary care clinics in the Veterans Administration

Bevanne A Bean-Mayberry  1 , Chung-Chou H Chang, Melissa A McNeil, Jeff Whittle, Patricia M Hayes, Sarah Hudson Scholle
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Patient satisfaction in women's clinics versus traditional primary care clinics in the Veterans Administration

Bevanne A Bean-Mayberry et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To compare patient satisfaction in women's clinics (WCs) versus traditional primary care clinics (TCs).

Design: Anonymous, cross-sectional mailed survey.

Setting: Eight Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers in 3 states.

Patients: A random sample of women stratified by site and enrollment in WC versus TC (total response rate = 61%).

Measures: Overall satisfaction and gender-specific satisfaction as measured by the Primary Care Satisfaction Survey for Women (PCSSW).

Analysis: We dichotomized the satisfaction scores (excellent versus all other), and compared excellent satisfaction in WCs versus TCs using logistic regression, controlling for demographics, health status, health care use, and location.

Results: Women enrolled in WCs were more likely than those in TCs to report excellent overall satisfaction (odds ratio, 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.00 to 2.02; P = .05). Multivariate models demonstrated that receipt of care in WCs was a significant positive predictor for all 5 satisfaction domains (i.e., getting care, privacy and comfort, communication, complete care, and follow-up care) with the gender-specific satisfaction instrument (PCSSW).

Conclusions: This study is the first to consistently show higher satisfaction in WCs versus TCs despite age and race differences and comparable health status. Since these WCs show better quality in terms of satisfaction, other quality indicators should be evaluated. If WCs reduce fragmentation and improve health care delivery, the model will be applicable in VA and non-VA outpatient settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Harpole LH, Mort EA, Freund KM, Orav J, Brennan TA. A comparison of the preventive health care provided by women's health centers and general internal medicine practices. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:1–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weisman CS, Rich DE, Rogers J, Crawford KG, Grayson CE, Henderson JT. Gender and patient satisfaction with primary care: tuning in to women in quality measurement. J Womens Health Gend-Based Med. 2000;9:657–65. - PubMed
    1. O'Malley AS, Forrest CB, O'Malley PG. Low-income women's priorities for primary care: a qualitative study. J Fam Pract. 2000;49:141–6. - PubMed
    1. van denBrink-Muinen A, Bensing JM, Kerssens JJ. Gender and communication style in general practice. Differences between women's health care and regular health care. Med Care. 1998;36:100–6. - PubMed
    1. Roter DL, Hall JA. Why physician gender matters in shaping the physician-patient relationship. J Womens Health. 1998;7:1093–7. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms