Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Apr;4(2):130-7.
doi: 10.1007/s11934-003-0040-0.

Laparoscopic and robotic surgical training in urology

Affiliations

Laparoscopic and robotic surgical training in urology

András Hoznek et al. Curr Urol Rep. 2003 Apr.

Abstract

The most important change in urology during the past decade was the development of minimally invasive surgery, particularly laparoscopy. However, the main drawback of laparoscopy is a steep learning curve, which results from the significant changes in the surgical environment. Although laparoscopy can provide important advantages for the patient, including decreased length of hospitalization, decreased analgesic requirement, and a shortened postoperative convalescence, one concern has been whether laparoscopic techniques should be learned solely in the operating room. For example, sports, music, and aviation are practiced before an actual performance is ever undertaken. In this review, the advantages and limitations of all available training modalities in minimally invasive surgery are described. Testing basic laparoscopic skills on inanimate models, becoming familiar with the principles of dissection and hemostasis on living animals, and studying surgical anatomy on cadavers should be considered as indispensable and complementary elements for laparoscopic training in the future. In addition, telementoring with the help of modern image processing and virtual reality eventually may become the basis of tomorrow's surgical instruction.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Surg Endosc. 1998 Sep;12(9):1111-6 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2002 May;167(5):2135-7 - PubMed
    1. JSLS. 2001 Apr-Jun;5(2):153-8 - PubMed
    1. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Nov;39(4):430-7 - PubMed
    1. Urology. 2002 Jul;60(1):39-45; discussion 45 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources