Primary angioplasty or thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction?

Comment

Johann Auer et al. Lancet. 2003.

. 2003 Mar 15;361(9361):965-6; author reply 967-8.

doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12746-8.

No abstract available

Comment on

Primary angioplasty versus "earlier" thrombolysis--time for a wake-up call.
Stone GW. Stone GW. Lancet. 2002 Sep 14;360(9336):814-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11010-5. Lancet. 2002. PMID: 12243913 No abstract available.
Primary angioplasty versus prehospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction: a randomised study.
Bonnefoy E, Lapostolle F, Leizorovicz A, Steg G, McFadden EP, Dubien PY, Cattan S, Boullenger E, Machecourt J, Lacroute JM, Cassagnes J, Dissait F, Touboul P; Comparison of Angioplasty and Prehospital Thromboysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction study group. Bonnefoy E, et al. Lancet. 2002 Sep 14;360(9336):825-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09963-4. Lancet. 2002. PMID: 12243916 Clinical Trial.
Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials.
Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Keeley EC, et al. Lancet. 2003 Jan 4;361(9351):13-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12113-7. Lancet. 2003. PMID: 12517460 Review.