Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Feb;8(1):49-57.
doi: 10.1023/a:1022344032001.

Selective atrionodal input ablation for induction of proximal complete heart block with stable junctional escape rhythm in patients with uncontrolled atrial fibrillation

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Selective atrionodal input ablation for induction of proximal complete heart block with stable junctional escape rhythm in patients with uncontrolled atrial fibrillation

Bernhard Strohmer et al. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2003 Feb.

Abstract

Background: The study tests the hypothesis that ablating all inputs to the atrioventricular (AV) node can result in complete heart block with stable junctional escape rhythm.

Methods and results: We attempted atrionodal input ablation in 76 consecutive patients with uncontrolled atrial fibrillation. Fast and slow pathways were first ablated. If there was no AV block, additional energy applications were done between fast and slow pathway locations. The patients were followed for 42 +/- 11 months. Group I (n = 57) comprised patients with complete heart block and junctional escape rhythm (53 +/- 4 beats/min) at the end of the procedure. The escape rhythm remained stable throughout follow-up. Group II (n = 15) were patients who failed the stepwise atrionodal input ablation and required AV junctional ablation guided by His bundle potential to achieve complete heart block. Four patients showed a slow escape rhythm after ablation (33 +/- 4 beats/min). Others had no escape rhythm. All 15 pts remained pacemaker dependent. The total death rate of groups I and II was 18/57 (31.6%) vs 10/15 (66.7%), respectively (p < 0.02). These differences could not be explained by a difference of left ventricular ejection fraction (0.42 +/- 0.07 vs 0.41 +/- 0.04, respectively, p = NS).

Conclusions: (1) In most patients, ablation of both fast and slow pathways did not result in complete heart block, indicating the presence of multiple atrionodal inputs. (2) Ablation of all atrionodal inputs may result in complete heart block with stable junctional escape rhythm. (3) As compared with AV junctional ablation, atrionodal input ablation was associated with a lower mortality rate on long-term follow up.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Circulation. 1996 May 1;93(9):1690-701 - PubMed
    1. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000 Nov;23(11 Pt 2):1925-9 - PubMed
    1. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1998 Feb;9(2):129-40 - PubMed
    1. Heart. 1996 May;75(5):502-8 - PubMed
    1. Am Heart J. 2000 Jan;139(1 Pt 1):122-5 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms