Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Feb;8(1):71-5.
doi: 10.1023/a:1022304417889.

Successful implantation of cardiac defibrillators without induction of ventricular fibrillation using upper limit of vulnerability testing

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Successful implantation of cardiac defibrillators without induction of ventricular fibrillation using upper limit of vulnerability testing

Ulrika Birgersdotter Green et al. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2003 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: Conventionally, the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is tested at implantation by measurement of defibrillation threshold (DFT), which involves repeated induction of ventricular fibrillation (VF). We report our data on successful ICD implantation without VF induction using a modified upper limit of vulnerability (ULV) testing method, compared to standard DFT testing.

Methods: Fourteen patients underwent ICD implantation using a modified ULV testing method by delivering a 15 J shock during the vulnerable period on the peak of the T wave, and if VF was not induced 15 J shocks were repeated at -20 and -40 msec before the peak of T wave. Failure to induce VF, indicating a ULV <15 joules (J), suggested a DFT < or =20 J based on previous studies demonstrating a close correlation (+/-5 J) between ULV and DFT. If VF was induced, a 20 J rescue shock was delivered. ICD therapy was then programmed on the basis of ULV testing. All patients underwent pre-discharge DFT testing to confirm adequate DFT.

Results: Using a modified ULV testing method, ICD implantation was completed without induction of VF in 8 patients and only a single episode of VF in 6 patients. The mean number of VF episodes (0.42 +/- 0.5) induced with ULV testing was significantly lower (p <.001) than the number induced during DFT testing (3.9 +/- 0.8). Pre-discharge DFT testing did not alter ICD programming in any patient. During follow-up of 14.85 +/- 12.31 months, three patients had seven episodes of VT/VF, six of whom were converted with the programmed first-shock strength, while one required a second high-energy shock to convert. This patient had a pre-discharge DFT of 10 joules.

Conclusions: Successful ICD implantation can be safely performed with no or fewer episodes of VF induction using a modified ULV testing method.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. N Engl J Med. 1997 Nov 27;337(22):1576-83 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 1995 Jul 1;92(1):59-65 - PubMed
    1. Am J Cardiol. 1997 May 1;79(9):1241-5 - PubMed
    1. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1999 Jul;3(2):155-61 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1996 Dec 26;335(26):1933-40 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms