Effects of peripheral nonlinearity on psychometric functions for forward-masked tones
- PMID: 12656391
- DOI: 10.1121/1.1543933
Effects of peripheral nonlinearity on psychometric functions for forward-masked tones
Abstract
Psychometric functions (PFs) for forward-masked tones were obtained for conditions in which signal level was varied to estimate threshold at several masker levels (variable-signal condition), and in which masker level was varied to estimate threshold at several signal levels (variable-masker condition). The changes in PF slope across combinations of masker frequency, masker level, and signal delay were explored in three experiments. In experiment 1, a 2-kHz, 10-ms tone was masked by a 50, 70 or 90 dB SPL, 20-ms on-frequency forward masker, with signal delays of 2, 20, or 40 ms, in a variable-signal condition. PF slopes decreased in conditions where signal threshold was high. In experiments 2 and 3, the signal was a 4-kHz, 10-ms tone, and the masker was either a 4- or 2.4-kHz, 200-ms tone. In experiment 2, on-frequency maskers were presented at 30 to 90 dB SPL in 10-dB steps and off-frequency maskers were presented at 60 to 90 dB SPL in 10-dB steps, with signal delays of 0, 10, or 30 ms, in a variable-signal condition. PF slopes decreased as signal level increased, and this trend was similar for on- and off-frequency maskers. In experiment 3, variable-masker conditions with on- and off-frequency maskers and 0-ms signal delay were presented. In general, the results were consistent with the hypothesis that peripheral nonlinearity is reflected in the PF slopes. The data also indicate that masker level plays a role independent of signal level, an effect that could be accounted for by assuming greater internal noise at higher stimulus levels.
Similar articles
-
Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.Ear Hear. 2007 Feb;28(1):2-17. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3180310212. Ear Hear. 2007. PMID: 17204895
-
Effect of masker level on overshoot in running- and frozen-noise maskers.J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Apr;95(4):2192-201. doi: 10.1121/1.408679. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994. PMID: 8201115
-
Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.Ear Hear. 2007 Sep;28(5):682-93. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31812f7156. Ear Hear. 2007. PMID: 17804982
-
Effects of masker frequency and duration in forward masking: further evidence for the influence of peripheral nonlinearity.Hear Res. 2000 Dec;150(1-2):258-66. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(00)00206-9. Hear Res. 2000. PMID: 11077208 Review.
-
Psychoacoustic consequences of compression in the peripheral auditory system.Psychol Rev. 1998 Jan;105(1):108-24. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.105.1.108. Psychol Rev. 1998. PMID: 9450373 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of distortion-product otoacoustic emission growth rates and slopes of forward-masked psychometric functions.J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Feb;129(2):864-75. doi: 10.1121/1.3523340. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011. PMID: 21361444 Free PMC article.
-
Nonadditivity of forward and simultaneous masking.J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Oct;134(4):2866-75. doi: 10.1121/1.4818766. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013. PMID: 24116423 Free PMC article.
-
Use of psychometric-function slopes for forward-masked tones to investigate cochlear nonlinearity.J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Oct;124(4):2196-215. doi: 10.1121/1.2968686. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008. PMID: 19062859 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous