Comparison of two home care protocols for total joint replacement

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the effect of a more-efficient home care protocol to manage total joint replacement (TJR) patients after surgery.

Design: A randomized trial of two home care protocols for TJR management.

Setting: A hospital-affiliated home healthcare agency in a large midwestern city.

Participants: Medicare-eligible individuals undergoing elective total hip or knee replacement surgery (N = 136).

Intervention: A home care protocol that included preoperative home visits by a nurse and a physical therapist and fewer postoperative visits (range of 9-12 visits) to the home than an existing protocol (range of 11-47 visits).

Measurements: Functional status, lower extremity functioning, health-related quality of life, satisfaction with care, and use and cost of healthcare services for 6 months postsurgery.

Results: There were no differences in functional status, health-related quality of life, or lower extremity functioning by group at 6 months. A marginally significant gain in satisfaction with access to care (P =.059) was found in the intervention group at 6 months. Home healthcare costs were 55% lower for the streamlined group (P <.001). Other costs did not differ significantly by group.

Conclusion: TJR patients who received the more-efficient home care protocol experienced comparable outcomes to those who received the existing protocol. An abbreviated set of home care visits resulted in more-efficient delivery of care without compromising patient outcomes.