Robotic radical prostatectomy and the Vattikuti Urology Institute technique: an interim analysis of results and technical points
- PMID: 12657356
- DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00116-x
Robotic radical prostatectomy and the Vattikuti Urology Institute technique: an interim analysis of results and technical points
Abstract
We have performed >350 robotic radical prostatectomies in the last 2 years. A single surgeon (MM) performed 250 of these procedures using a technique developed at our institution, the Vattikuti Urology Institute. This article summarizes the technical highlights and interim results of the Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy (VIP) technique. We prospectively collected baseline demographic data, such as age, race, body mass index (BMI), serum prostate-specific antigen values, prostate volume, Gleason score, percentage cancer, TNM clinical staging, and comorbidities. Urinary symptoms were measured with the International Prostate Symptom Score, and sexual health with the Sexual Health Inventory of Males. In addition, patients received the Expanded Prostate Inventory Composite at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months after the procedure via mail. Data collection is complete on 200 of the first 250 patient cases. Gleason score >or=7 was noted in 40% of patients. The average BMI was high (28), and 86% patients were classified as pathologic stage pT2a to pT2b. The mean operative time was 160 minutes and the mean blood loss was 153 mL. No patient required blood transfusion. At 6 months, 82% of the men who were <60 years of age and 75% of those >60 years of age had return of sexual function, and 64% and 38%, respectively, had sexual intercourse. At 6 months, 96% patients were continent.
Similar articles
-
Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.Arch Esp Urol. 2011 Oct;64(8):823-9. Arch Esp Urol. 2011. PMID: 22052763 English, Spanish.
-
A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.008. Epub 2007 Oct 22. J Urol. 2007. PMID: 17936849
-
A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.J Urol. 2007 Aug;178(2):478-82. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.111. Epub 2007 Jun 11. J Urol. 2007. PMID: 17561160
-
Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 1100 cases.Urol Clin North Am. 2004 Nov;31(4):701-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2004.06.011. Urol Clin North Am. 2004. PMID: 15474597 Review.
-
Histopathologic outcomes of robotic radical prostatectomy.ScientificWorldJournal. 2006 Jun 2;6:2566-72. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2006.397. ScientificWorldJournal. 2006. PMID: 17619732 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The effect of body characteristics on mean operative times while experiencing the learning curve for robotic prostatectomy.J Robot Surg. 2009 Jun;3(2):71-4. doi: 10.1007/s11701-009-0138-6. Epub 2009 Mar 24. J Robot Surg. 2009. PMID: 27638217
-
Development of robotic program: an Asian experience.World J Urol. 2006 Jun;24(2):161-4. doi: 10.1007/s00345-006-0069-z. Epub 2006 Apr 11. World J Urol. 2006. PMID: 16607550
-
Transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy after prosthetic mesh herniorrhaphy.JSLS. 2009 Apr-Jun;13(2):142-7. JSLS. 2009. PMID: 19660206 Free PMC article.
-
Is the transition from open to robotic prostatectomy fair to your patients? A single-surgeon comparison with 2-year follow-up.J Robot Surg. 2010 Jan;3(4):201-7. doi: 10.1007/s11701-009-0162-6. Epub 2009 Nov 19. J Robot Surg. 2010. PMID: 27628630
-
Robotic prostatectomy - a review.MedGenMed. 2004 Oct 25;6(4):20. MedGenMed. 2004. PMID: 15775847 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical