Cardiovascular outcomes in the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial of patients with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy
- PMID: 12667024
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-7-200304010-00010
Cardiovascular outcomes in the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial of patients with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy
Abstract
Background: Patients with diabetes have increased risk for adverse cardiovascular events. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are protective in type 1 diabetes. However, no definitive studies have examined the use of angiotensin-receptor blockers in patients with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy. The primary outcomes of the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial were doubling of serum creatinine levels, end-stage renal disease, and death from any cause.
Objective: To compare rates of cardiovascular events among patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy who received conventional antihypertensive therapy with an angiotensin-receptor blocker (irbesartan) or a calcium-channel blocker (amlodipine), or placebo.
Design: Randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with a median follow-up of 2.6 years. A time event analysis was used.
Setting: 209 centers in the Americas, Europe, Israel, and Australasia.
Participants: 1715 adults with type 2 diabetic nephropathy and hypertension; serum creatinine levels of 89 micromol/L (1.0 mg/dL) to 266 micromol/L (3.0 mg/dL) in women and 106 micromol/L (1.2 mg/dL) to 266 micromol/L (3.0 mg/dL) in men; and urinary protein excretion rates of at least 900 mg/d.
Intervention: Treatment with irbesartan, amlodipine, or placebo.
Measurements: Time to cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, strokes, and coronary revascularization.
Results: The three groups were not statistically different in the composite of cardiovascular events. Among the components of the composite, there was a trend toward a decrease in strokes in patients receiving amlodipine versus those receiving placebo (hazard ratio, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.35 to 1.22]; P = 0.18). Likewise, patients receiving amlodipine had a significantly lower rate of myocardial infarction when compared with placebo recipients (hazard ratio, 0.58 [CI, 0.37 to 0.92]; P = 0.02). In contrast, patients receiving irbesartan had a significantly lower incidence of congestive heart failure when compared with placebo recipients (hazard ratio, 0.72 [CI, 0.52 to 1.00]; P = 0.048) or amlodipine recipients (hazard ratio, 0.65 [CI, 0.48 to 0.87]; P = 0.004).
Conclusion: The composite cardiovascular event rate did not differ in patients with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy treated with irbesartan, amlodipine, or placebo in addition to conventional antihypertensive therapy.
Comment in
-
Do irbesartan and amlodipine reduce cardiovascular events in diabetic patients?J Fam Pract. 2003 Aug;52(8):593-4. J Fam Pract. 2003. PMID: 12899808
Summary for patients in
-
Summaries for patients. Effects of blood pressure drugs in patients with diabetes and kidney disease.Ann Intern Med. 2003 Apr 1;138(7):I43. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-7-200304010-00003. Ann Intern Med. 2003. PMID: 12667050 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The Irbesartan type II diabetic nephropathy trial: study design and baseline patient characteristics. For the Collaborative Study Group.Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000 Apr;15(4):487-97. doi: 10.1093/ndt/15.4.487. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000. PMID: 10727543 Clinical Trial.
-
Treatment of diabetic nephropathy with angiotensin II receptor antagonist.Clin Exp Nephrol. 2003 Mar;7(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s101570300000. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2003. PMID: 14586737 Review.
-
A clinical trial in type 2 diabetic nephropathy.Am J Kidney Dis. 2001 Oct;38(4 Suppl 1):S191-4. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.27442. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001. PMID: 11576953 Clinical Trial.
-
Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes.N Engl J Med. 2001 Sep 20;345(12):851-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011303. N Engl J Med. 2001. PMID: 11565517 Clinical Trial.
-
Irbesartan: a review of its use in hypertension and in the management of diabetic nephropathy.Drugs. 2004;64(9):999-1028. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200464090-00011. Drugs. 2004. PMID: 15101793 Review.
Cited by
-
The Impact of Different Antihypertensive Drugs on Cardiovascular Risk in Isolated Systolic Hypertension with Type 2 Diabetes Patients.J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 1;11(21):6486. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216486. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 36362714 Free PMC article.
-
Antihypertensive, antiproteinuric therapy and myocardial infarction and stroke prevention.Curr Hypertens Rep. 2005 Oct;7(5):367-73. doi: 10.1007/s11906-005-0073-5. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2005. PMID: 16157081 Review.
-
A current evaluation of the safety of angiotensin receptor blockers and direct renin inhibitors.Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2011;7:297-313. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S15541. Epub 2011 May 19. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2011. PMID: 21633727 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reducing the risk of stroke in type 2 diabetes: pathophysiological and therapeutic perspectives.J Neurol. 2009 Oct;256(10):1603-19. doi: 10.1007/s00415-009-5143-1. Epub 2009 Apr 29. J Neurol. 2009. PMID: 19399381
-
Effects of calcium channel blockers comparing to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with hypertension and chronic kidney disease stage 3 to 5 and dialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2017 Dec 14;12(12):e0188975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188975. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 29240784 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical