The business case for quality: case studies and an analysis
- PMID: 12674405
- DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.2.17
The business case for quality: case studies and an analysis
Abstract
The financial implications of implementing quality improvements are often poorly understood. Simply put, does improving quality yield a return on investment? We examine four cases--management of high-cost pharmaceuticals, diabetes management, smoking cessation, and wellness programs in the workplace--to understand the financial and clinical implications of improving care. We explore costs and benefits, in both the short and the long term, to four stakeholders with different and sometimes conflicting interests: providers, purchasers and employers, individual patients, and society. Finally, we recommend policy changes to better align financial incentives for superior quality of care.
Comment in
-
Medicaid can push for quality.Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Jul-Aug;22(4):260. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.4.260. Health Aff (Millwood). 2003. PMID: 12889776 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Expanding health insurance coverage for smoking cessation treatments: experience of the Pacific Business Group on Health.Am J Health Promot. 2001 May-Jun;15(5):350-6. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-15.5.350. Am J Health Promot. 2001. PMID: 11502016
-
Financial Incentives and Diabetes Disease Control in Employees: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Aug;31(8):871-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3686-2. Epub 2016 Apr 11. J Gen Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 27067350 Free PMC article.
-
Health promotion and disease prevention: a look at demand management programs.EBRI Issue Brief. 1996 Sep;(177):1-14. EBRI Issue Brief. 1996. PMID: 10161533
-
Current trends in reducing cardiovascular risk factors in the United States: focus on worksite health and wellness.Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2014 Mar-Apr;56(5):476-83. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Oct 5. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2014. PMID: 24607011 Review.
-
Clinical preventive medicine in business and industry: the economic impact.J Health Soc Policy. 1994;6(1):59-70. doi: 10.1300/j045v06n01_06. J Health Soc Policy. 1994. PMID: 10140440 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison between a multi-pavilion hospital and a single pavilion hospital.Clujul Med. 2016;89(3):402-9. doi: 10.15386/cjmed-607. Epub 2016 Jul 28. Clujul Med. 2016. PMID: 27547061 Free PMC article.
-
Strange Bedfellows: A Local Insurer/Physician Practice Partnership to Fund Innovation.J Healthc Qual. 2015 Sep-Oct;37(5):298-310. doi: 10.1111/jhq.12057. J Healthc Qual. 2015. PMID: 26042760 Free PMC article.
-
Why providers participate in clinical trials: considering the National Cancer Institute's Community Clinical Oncology Program.Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Nov;33(6):1143-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.08.008. Epub 2012 Aug 19. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012. PMID: 22925970 Free PMC article.
-
The business case for provider participation in clinical trials research: an application to the National Cancer Institute's community clinical oncology program.Health Care Manage Rev. 2013 Oct-Dec;38(4):284-94. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e31827292fc. Health Care Manage Rev. 2013. PMID: 23044836 Free PMC article.
-
Maintaining Implementation through Dynamic Adaptations (MIDAS): protocol for a cluster-randomized trial of implementation strategies to optimize and sustain use of evidence-based practices in Veteran Health Administration (VHA) patients.Implement Sci Commun. 2022 May 14;3(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00297-z. Implement Sci Commun. 2022. PMID: 35568903 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical