Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Apr;12(2):100-6.
doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.2.100.

Quality indicators for primary care mental health services

Affiliations

Quality indicators for primary care mental health services

T Shield et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: To identify a generic set of face valid quality indicators for primary care mental health services which reflect a multi-stakeholder perspective and can be used for facilitating quality improvement.

Design: Modified two-round postal Delphi questionnaire.

Setting: Geographical spread across Great Britain.

Participants: One hundred and fifteen panellists representing 11 different stakeholder groups within primary care mental health services (clinical psychologist, health and social care commissioner, community psychiatric nurse, counsellor, general practitioner, practice nurse/district nurse/health visitor, psychiatrist, social worker, carer, patient and voluntary organisations).

Main outcome measures: Face validity (median rating of 8 or 9 on a nine point scale with agreement by all panels) for assessing quality of care.

Results: A maximum of 334 indicators were rated by panels in the second round; 26% were rated valid by all panels. These indicators were categorised into 21 aspects of care, 11 relating to general practices and 10 relating to health authorities or primary care groups/trusts. There was variation in the total number of indicators rated valid across the different panels. Overall, GPs rated the lowest number of indicators as valid (41%, n=138) and carers rated the highest number valid (91%, n=304).

Conclusions: The quality indicators represent consensus among key stakeholder groups in defining quality of care within primary care mental health services. These indicators could provide a guide for primary care organisations embarking on quality improvement initiatives in mental health care when addressing national targets and standards relating to primary care set out in the National Service Framework for Mental Health for England. Although many of the indicators relate to parochial issues in UK service delivery, the methodology used in the development of the indicators could be applied in other settings to produce locally relevant indicators.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Psychol Med. 1985 Aug;15(3):507-14 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1993 Oct 21;329(17):1263-5 - PubMed
    1. Int J Qual Health Care. 1996 Aug;8(4):321-9 - PubMed
    1. Sante Publique. 1998 Jun;10(2):191-201 - PubMed
    1. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1998 Nov;98(5):400-5 - PubMed

Publication types