A randomized trial using ultrasound to identify the high-risk fetus in a low-risk population
- PMID: 12681862
- DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)03122-8
A randomized trial using ultrasound to identify the high-risk fetus in a low-risk population
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effect of introducing two biophysical ultrasound examinations in a low-risk antenatal population. Scans were performed at 30-32 weeks' gestation and 36-37 weeks' gestation.
Methods: Scans assessed placental maturity, amniotic fluid volume, and estimated fetal weight. One thousand nine hundred ninety-eight low-risk patients were randomized at 30 weeks' gestation to a control group receiving standard antenatal care, or to the study group who also received an ultrasound scan. Outcome measures were frequency of small for dates (less than 10th percentile at birth), intervention rates, and admissions to neonatal intensive care.
Results: The proportion of infants assessed as small for dates at birth in the study group was 6.9% (69 of 994) compared with 10.4% (104 of 999) in the control group (P =.008). The rates of intervention in the study and control groups were 31.3% (313 of 999) and 16.9% (169 of 999), respectively (P <.001). Twenty-eight (2.8%) neonates in the study group were admitted to the neonatal unit compared with 34 (3.4%) in the control group (P =.532).
Conclusion: Introduction of an ultrasound scan at 30-32 weeks' and 36-37 weeks' gestation may reduce the risk of a growth-restricted infant and increases antenatal interventions. Rates of admission to a neonatal unit are not significantly affected.
Similar articles
-
Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates at 35-37 weeks' gestation: contribution of maternal factors and growth velocity between 20 and 36 weeks.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;53(4):488-495. doi: 10.1002/uog.20243. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30779239
-
Customized fetal weight limits for antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jan;15(1):36-40. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00001.x. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000. PMID: 10776010
-
Ultrasound screening for fetal growth restriction at 36 vs 32 weeks' gestation: a randomized trial (ROUTE).Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;46(4):391-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.14915. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 26031399 Clinical Trial.
-
Diagnosis and surveillance of late-onset fetal growth restriction.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2S):S790-S802.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.003. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29422212 Review.
-
Planning management and delivery of the growth-restricted fetus.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 May;49:53-65. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.02.009. Epub 2018 Mar 1. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018. PMID: 29606482 Review.
Cited by
-
Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks' gestation).Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 29;2015(6):CD001451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001451.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26121659 Free PMC article.
-
Fetal well-being assessment in bovine near-term gestations: current knowledge and future perspectives arising from comparative medicine.Can Vet J. 2007 Feb;48(2):178-83. Can Vet J. 2007. PMID: 17334032 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Selective versus universal third trimester ultrasound: Time for a rethink? An audit of current practices at a metropolitan Sydney hospital.Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2018 Mar 22;21(2):96-103. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12082. eCollection 2018 May. Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2018. PMID: 34760509 Free PMC article.
-
Do Regular Ultrasound Scans Reduce the Incidence of Stillbirth in Women with Apparently Normal Pregnancies?Ulster Med J. 2015 May;84(2):98-101. Ulster Med J. 2015. PMID: 26170484 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;55(2):177-188. doi: 10.1002/uog.20299. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 31006913 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources