High defibrillation thresholds in transvenous biphasic implantable defibrillators: clinical predictors and prognostic implications
- PMID: 12685138
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00148.x
High defibrillation thresholds in transvenous biphasic implantable defibrillators: clinical predictors and prognostic implications
Abstract
The aim of this study was to identify clinical characteristics that distinguish patients with high DFTs and assess the prognostic implication. DFTs testing is a lengthy, potentially painful, and a hazardous process. Little information is available concerning the identification of patients with high DFT who undergo ICD surgery with transvenous leads and biphasic energy. This study analyzed 968 patients from two separate clinical studies who received a Medtronic cardioverter defibrillator from January 1995 through November 1999 and who had DFT testing measured by a binary search protocol. Compared to 865 patients with low defibrillation thresholds (< 18 J), the 103 patients with high thresholds (> or = 18 J) had a lower LVEF (34 +/- 16.7 vs 38.3 +/- 16.2%, P = 0.01), a worse NYHA functional class (23% Class I, 43% Class II, 29% Class III, 5% Class IV vs. 27% Class I, 55% Class II, 17% Class III, 1% Class IV, P < 0.0001), had bypass surgery less often (10.7 vs 27.5%, P < 0.0001), used amiodarone within the past 6 weeks (42.7 vs 27.2%, P = 0.002), and had a history of ventricular fibrillation more often (44.7 vs 33.1%, P = 0.02). Information concerning the number of shocks delivered was available in 345 (35%) patients; 23 were in the high DFT group and 322 were in the low DFT group. Twelve (52%) of the 23 patients in the high DFT arm received 3.6 +/- 2.7 shocks (median 2.5) and 106 (33%) of the 322 patients with low DFT received 4.9 +/- 9.5 shocks (median 2). After 6 months the mortality rate of patients with high thresholds was 11.7 vs 7.8% in patients with low thresholds (P = 0.118). Using a multivariate logistic regression model the significant predictors of death were older age, higher NYHA class, lower LVEF, amiodarone use, had a presenting arrhythmia of ventricular fibrillation and CHF but not initial high defibrillation thresholds. The study found that (1) 11% of patients have high DFTs, (2) clinical characteristics that identify high defibrillation thresholds are NYHA Class III, IV, low ejection fraction, no previous history of bypass surgery, prior amiodarone use preoperatively, and presenting with ventricular fibrillation, and (3) while high DFTs were associated with a more ill patient population, there was no difference in survival in a 6-month follow-up. Patients with a predicted low DFTs may be eligible for abbreviated ICD testing while high risk patients require formal testing.
Similar articles
-
Determinants of patient survival rate after implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator without resynchronisation capability.Kardiol Pol. 2012;70(11):1099-110. Kardiol Pol. 2012. PMID: 23180517
-
Comparison of defibrillation efficacy using implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with single- or dual-coil defibrillation leads and active can.Kardiol Pol. 2005 Sep;63(3):234-41; discussion 242-3. Kardiol Pol. 2005. PMID: 16180177 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical predictors of defibrillation threshold in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.Kardiol Pol. 2005 Apr;62(4):317-28; discussion 329-31. Kardiol Pol. 2005. PMID: 15928737 English, Polish.
-
Antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2005;5(6):371-8. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200505060-00004. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2005. PMID: 16259525 Review.
-
Defibrillators: Selecting the Right Device for the Right Patient.Circulation. 2016 Nov 1;134(18):1390-1404. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021889. Circulation. 2016. PMID: 27799257 Review.
Cited by
-
New technologies of internal defibrillation.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2005 Aug;13 Suppl 1:67-70. doi: 10.1007/s10840-005-0752-9. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2005. PMID: 16133858 Review.
-
Induction by direct current pulse versus 50-Hz pacing on ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2010 Sep;28(3):209-14. doi: 10.1007/s10840-010-9486-4. Epub 2010 May 12. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2010. PMID: 20461546
-
Defibrillation testing of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator: when, how, and by whom?Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2007 Aug 1;7(3):166-75. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2007. PMID: 17684575 Free PMC article.
-
[Is the determination of the defibrillation threshold in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator still required?].Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2011 Dec;22(4):209-13. doi: 10.1007/s00399-011-0150-1. Epub 2011 Nov 13. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2011. PMID: 22080419 German.
-
Clinical implications of left superior vena cava persistence in candidates for pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator implantation.Heart Vessels. 2009 Mar;24(2):142-6. doi: 10.1007/s00380-008-1091-4. Epub 2009 Apr 1. Heart Vessels. 2009. PMID: 19337799
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous