Immediate loading of Brånemark implants: a 24-month follow-up of a comparative prospective pilot study between mandibular overdentures supported by Conical transmucosal and standard MK II implants
- PMID: 12685794
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00171.x
Immediate loading of Brånemark implants: a 24-month follow-up of a comparative prospective pilot study between mandibular overdentures supported by Conical transmucosal and standard MK II implants
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this prospective study is to compare the long-term outcome of immediately loaded implant-retained mandibular overdentures supported by four screw-type one-piece transmucosal implants with that of four screw-type two-piece implants inserted in the interforaminal area of the mandible and rigidly connected by a U-shaped curved
Materials and methods: A prospective pilot study was conducted with 10 patients receiving an implant-supported overdenture in the mandible. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups. In the control group (five patients), four standard Brånemark implants (MK II; Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden), 3.75 mm large and at least 10 mm long, were sited anterior to the mental foramina, and four standard abutments (Nobel Biocare AB) for bar construction were immediately screwed to the implants. In the test group (five patients), four conical transmucosal implants (Nobel Biocare AB), 3.75 mm large and at least 9 mm long in the threaded part, were sited anterior to the mental foramina. Immediately after implant placement, a U-shaped gold or titanium bar was fabricated and implants were immediately loaded (within 24 h) in both groups with an implant-retained overdenture. The patients were followed up for a minimum of 24 months. Implants were evaluated at the time of immediate loading and at 12 and 24 months after prosthetic loading, with the following parameters: modified plaque index (MPI), modified bleeding index (MBI), and probing depth (PD). Periimplant bone resorption was evaluated on panoramic radiographs taken 12 and 24 months after the beginning of prosthetic loading.
Results: No significant differences were found between the two groups with regard to MPI, MBI, PD, and periimplant bone resorption at 12 and 24 months. The cumulative success rate of implants according to the criteria proposed by Albrektsson and colleagues was 100% in both groups after 2 years of functional loading.
Conclusions: Results from this study demonstrated that the success rate for immediately loaded mandibular implants is similar to that obtained in cases of delayed loading and that there are no significant differences between results with two-piece implants and one-piece transmucosal implants.
Similar articles
-
Implant-retained mandibular overdentures with immediate loading: a 3- to 8-year prospective study on 328 implants.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5(1):29-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00179.x. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003. PMID: 12831726
-
Implant-retained mandibular overdentures with Brånemark System MKII implants: a prospective comparative study between delayed and immediate loading.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001 Jul-Aug;16(4):537-46. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001. PMID: 11516001 Clinical Trial.
-
Marginal bone level changes and prosthetic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 2 implants: a 5-year randomized clinical trial.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010 Jun 1;12(2):114-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00143.x. Epub 2009 Feb 13. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010. PMID: 19220845 Clinical Trial.
-
Loading protocols for implant-supported overdentures in the edentulous jaw: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:271-86. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g4.4. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014. PMID: 24660203
-
Immediate Versus Non-immediate Loading Protocols for Reduced-Diameter Implants Supporting Overdentures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2024 Oct 16;39(5):657-664. doi: 10.11607/jomi.10625. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2024. PMID: 38498788
Cited by
-
Titanium oral implants: surface characteristics, interface biology and clinical outcome.J R Soc Interface. 2010 Oct 6;7 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S515-27. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2010.0118.focus. Epub 2010 Jun 30. J R Soc Interface. 2010. PMID: 20591849 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The biological activity of propolis-containing toothpaste on oral health environment in patients who underwent implant-supported prosthodontic rehabilitation.Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:704947. doi: 10.1155/2013/704947. Epub 2013 May 14. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013. PMID: 23762153 Free PMC article.
-
Delayed versus immediate loading of implants: survival analysis and risk factors for dental implant failure.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Feb;66(2):251-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.09.012. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008. PMID: 18201604 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources