Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Apr;29(4):741-6.
doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01740-6.

Evaluation of the practicality of optical biometry and applanation ultrasound in 253 eyes

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of the practicality of optical biometry and applanation ultrasound in 253 eyes

Mana Tehrani et al. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the percentage of eyes that could not be measured using optical biometry and ultrasound applanation and the reasons.

Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Hospital, Mainz, Germany.

Methods: Optical biometry (IOLMaster, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) and A-scan ultrasound biometry were performed consecutively in 253 eyes scheduled for cataract surgery the next day. Lens opacities were evaluated with the Opacity Lensmeter (Interzeag), and a slitlamp examination and measurement of visual acuity were performed. The 2 techniques were compared in terms of the rate of and reasons for primary measurement failure.

Results: Measurement with the IOLMaster was not possible in 44 eyes (17%). Failed measurements were the result of a combination of low visual acuity and lens opacity in 45% of eyes, posterior subcapsular opacity in 25%, and macular disease in 7%. Measurement with ultrasound biometry was not possible in 10 eyes (4%); 7 eyes were filled with silicone oil and in 3 cases, the patient refused biometry.

Conclusions: Optical biometry allowed comfortable, noncontact, high-precision measurement in the optical axis. Uncorrected visual acuity and lens opacity were predictors of successful measurements. Eyes with dense cataract or poor visual acuity are better evaluated using ultrasound applanation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms