Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Apr;95(4):490-4.
doi: 10.1067/moe.2003.32.

The effect of various intracanal oxidizing agents on the push-out strength of various perforation repair materials

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The effect of various intracanal oxidizing agents on the push-out strength of various perforation repair materials

Emine C Loxley et al. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of intracanal oxidizing agents on the strength of materials used to repair root perforations.

Study design: Standardized perforations in bovine root samples were repaired with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), Super-EBA cement (S-EBA), or intermediate restorative material (IRM). After 7 days, 10 samples from each group were tested for push-out strength with an Instron machine (controls). The remaining samples were immersed in NaOCl, sodium perborate mixed with saline (SPB+S), Superoxol (SO), sodium perborate mixed with Superoxol (SPB+SO), or saline for 7 days to investigate the effect of irrigating and walking bleach compounds on the perforation repair materials. Push-out strength values were compared with those of the dry materials to determine whether any loss of integrity had occurred.

Results: MTA was statistically significantly less resistant across conditions to displacement than S-EBA or IRM. IRM was consistent across treatment conditions, whereas S-EBA lost strength when exposed to NaOCl, SPB+S, or SPB+SO. Exposure to SPB+S had the greatest effect on all 3 materials.

Conclusions: IRM performed consistently as a perforation repair material despite exposure to oxidizing agents, whereas MTA was less resistant to dislodgement than either IRM or S-EBA and was more affected than IRM by sodium perborate-containing bleaching solutions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources