Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Mar;388(1):33-41.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-003-0358-6. Epub 2003 Feb 28.

Is parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy a noble option in the surgical treatment for high-risk patients with hilar bile duct cancer?

Affiliations

Is parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy a noble option in the surgical treatment for high-risk patients with hilar bile duct cancer?

Hiroshi Shimada et al. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2003 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The essential minimum of hepatic segmentectomy combined with caudate lobectomy (parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy) has been recommended particularly for high-risk patients with hilar bile duct cancer to minimize the risk of postoperative liver failure. This quality control study investigated whether parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy is a "noble option" in the surgical treatment of hilar bile duct cancer.

Patients and methods: A total of 53 patients with hilar bile duct cancer underwent surgical resection. These patients were retrospectively classified into a major hepatectomy group (major Hx, n=30), a parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy group (preserving Hx, n=11), and a hilar bile duct resection group (HBDR, n=12). A preserving Hx consisted of caudate lobectomy, either alone (n=3), or combined with resection of segment 4 (S4, n=4), or S58 (n=3) or S458 (n=1). The preserving Hx was used for high-risk patients in whom tumor tissue was diagnosed to be Bismuth type I and II by preoperative selective percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography.

Results: The mean numbers of hepatico-jejunostomies were 2.8, 4.8, and 4.6 in the respective groups. Mortality rates including hospital death were 13.3%, 0%, and 0% respectively. Morbidity rates were 46.7%, 54.5%, and 33.3%. The preserving Hx group encountered no liver failure (T.Bil>10 mg/dl, encephalopathy) but acquired hyperbilirubinemia (T.Bil>5 mg/dl), pulmonary insufficiency and other complications at the same frequency as in the major Hx group. The survival rates in the three groups were 35.6%, 52.5%, and 48.6% at 3 years and 25.2%, 14.9%, and 24.3% at 5 years respectively. Curability rates (R0 to R1+2) were 76.7%, 54.5% and 50.0%, respectively. Preserving Hx tended to result in higher frequencies of positive transmural margins (e.g., cancer cells remaining around the right hepatic artery or the portal vein).

Conclusions: Preserving hepatectomy for high-risk patients should be limited strictly to patients who do not have tumors which are not invading adjacent organs (e.g., T2) nor a segmental duct and are confined longitudinally to the right or the left.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Surgery. 1998 Feb;123(2):131-6 - PubMed
    1. Surgery. 2000 Apr;127(4):395-404 - PubMed
    1. Int Surg. 1988 Apr-Jun;73(2):87-90 - PubMed
    1. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2000;7(2):155-62 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 1998 Mar;175(3):229-31 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources