Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Feb;63(3):98-102.

[Evaluation of two injection protocols by time-density curves for possible application to hepatic dynamic and upper abdominal CT angiography in MDCT: high concentration (350 mgI/ml) with conventional volume (100 ml) vs. conventional concentration (300 mgI/ml) with larger volume (150 ml) and higher injection rate]

[Article in Japanese]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 12692964

[Evaluation of two injection protocols by time-density curves for possible application to hepatic dynamic and upper abdominal CT angiography in MDCT: high concentration (350 mgI/ml) with conventional volume (100 ml) vs. conventional concentration (300 mgI/ml) with larger volume (150 ml) and higher injection rate]

[Article in Japanese]
Munetaka Matoba et al. Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 2003 Feb.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare two different injection protocols for possible application to hepatic dynamic CT and CT angiography of the upper abdomen. Single-level dynamic CT scans through the level of the porta heapatis were performed with an MDCT unit every 3 sec in 32 patients using protocol A (350 mgI/ml iodine contrast medium, total volume 100 ml, injection rate 3.0 ml/sec), and in 39 patients using protocol B (300 mgI/ml, 150 ml, 4.5 ml/sec). Injection duration was kept the same in the two protocols. Time-density curves of the abdominal aorta (Ao), liver (L), and portal vein (PV) were created and compared. Peak enhancements were significantly higher in protocol B than in protocol A, in all of Ao, L, and PV. Time to peak enhancement was shorter in protocol B than in protocol A, reaching statistical significance in Ao and PV, but not in L. The duration of the arterial phase was shorter in protocol B than in protocol A, but the difference was not statistically significant. Our data suggest the superiority of protocol B over protocol A, for possible application to hepatic dynamic CT and CT angiography of the upper abdomen in MDCT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources