Clinical and economic choices in anaesthesia for day surgery: a prospective randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 12693995
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03125.x
Clinical and economic choices in anaesthesia for day surgery: a prospective randomised controlled trial
Abstract
We compared the cost-effectiveness of general anaesthetic agents in adult and paediatric day surgery populations. We randomly assigned 1063 adult and 322 paediatric elective patients to one of four (adult) or two (paediatric) anaesthesia groups. Total costs were calculated from individual patient resource use to 7 days post discharge. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were expressed as cost per episode of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) avoided. In adults, variable secondary care costs were higher for propofol induction and propofol maintenance (propofol/propofol; p < 0.01) than other groups and lower in propofol induction and isoflurane maintenance (propofol/isoflurane; p < 0.01). In both studies, predischarge PONV was higher if sevoflurane/sevoflurane (p < 0.01) was used compared with use of propofol for induction. In both studies, there was no difference in postdischarge outcomes at Day 7. Sevoflurane/sevoflurane was more costly with higher PONV rates in both studies. In adults, the cost per extra episode of PONV avoided was pound 296 (propofol/propofol vs. propofol/ sevoflurane) and pound 333 (propofol/sevoflurane vs. propofol/isoflurane).
Comment in
-
Clinical and economic choices in anaesthesia for day surgery.Anaesthesia. 2003 Oct;58(10):1031; author reply 1031-2. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03415_11.x. Anaesthesia. 2003. PMID: 12969057 No abstract available.
-
Doing more with less.Anaesthesia. 2003 Nov;58(11):1053-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03520.x. Anaesthesia. 2003. PMID: 14616589 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of sevoflurane and propofol for ambulatory anaesthesia in gynaecological surgery.Can J Anaesth. 1998 Dec;45(12):1148-50. doi: 10.1007/BF03012454. Can J Anaesth. 1998. PMID: 10051930 Clinical Trial.
-
Economic evaluation of sevoflurane vs propofol for ambulatory anaesthesia.Can J Anaesth. 1998 Dec;45(12):1141-3. doi: 10.1007/BF03012452. Can J Anaesth. 1998. PMID: 10051928 English, French. No abstract available.
-
Which anaesthetic agents are cost-effective in day surgery? Literature review, national survey of practice and randomised controlled trial.Health Technol Assess. 2002;6(30):1-264. doi: 10.3310/hta6300. Health Technol Assess. 2002. PMID: 12709296 Review. No abstract available.
-
Induction with sevoflurane-remifentanil is comparable to propofol-fentanyl-rocuronium in PONV after laparoscopic surgery.Can J Anaesth. 2004 Aug-Sep;51(7):660-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03018422. Can J Anaesth. 2004. PMID: 15310632 Clinical Trial.
-
Sevoflurane: an ideal agent for adult day-case anesthesia?Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003 Sep;47(8):917-31. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00196.x. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003. PMID: 12904182 Review.
Cited by
-
Cost-effectiveness of different regimens of anesthesia for day surgery in China.Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014 Dec 15;7(12):5744-50. eCollection 2014. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014. PMID: 25664101 Free PMC article.
-
Management of postoperative nausea and vomiting in children.Paediatr Drugs. 2007;9(1):47-69. doi: 10.2165/00148581-200709010-00005. Paediatr Drugs. 2007. PMID: 17291136 Review.
-
[First experience with outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Tunisia].Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Sep 27;28:78. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.28.78.9564. eCollection 2017. Pan Afr Med J. 2017. PMID: 29255548 Free PMC article. French.
-
Induction of anaesthesia: a guide to drug choice.Drugs. 2007;67(5):701-23. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200767050-00005. Drugs. 2007. PMID: 17385942 Review.
-
Intravenous versus inhalational anaesthesia for paediatric outpatient surgery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 7;2014(2):CD009015. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009015.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 24510622 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources