Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2003 Mar;82(3):269-74.
doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00110.x.

Endometrial thermoablation for treatment of menorrhagia: comparison of two methods in outpatient setting

Affiliations
Free article
Clinical Trial

Endometrial thermoablation for treatment of menorrhagia: comparison of two methods in outpatient setting

Kimmo K Vihko et al. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003 Mar.
Free article

Erratum in

  • Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003 Dec;82(12):1156

Abstract

Background: Menorrhagia is one of the commonest reasons for gynecologic consultations. Inhibitors of fibrinolysis and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are generally used as therapy for the condition with an acceptable response in some patients. Endometrial ablation is one choice in patients suffering from menorrhagia. It can be performed in patients with no endometrial histological or anatomical pathology. In this method, the functional endometrial tissue is ablated under general anesthesia in an outpatient setting.

Methods: We compared two methods that are widely used in Finland (Menotreat and Cavaterm) in thermoablation of endometrial tissue in 31 patients that were randomized into two treatment groups.

Results: Endometrial ablation was effective in the treatment of menorrhagia in patients with normal endometrial structure. About 70% of the patients described the result of the treatment as 'very good'. Only one patient underwent a hysterectomy during the 6-month follow-up period because of problems related to uterine bleedings. The two methods were similar in efficacy and patient acceptance.

Conclusions: Both thermoablation techniques were well accepted by our patients and showed similar and good efficacy and patient acceptance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

LinkOut - more resources