Clinical outcomes of Fränkel appliance therapy assessed with a counterpart analysis
- PMID: 12695764
- DOI: 10.1067/mod.2003.74
Clinical outcomes of Fränkel appliance therapy assessed with a counterpart analysis
Abstract
To evaluate whether the Fränkel Regulator-II (FR-II) induced mandibular growth rotations relative to the nasomaxilla and the middle cranial fossae, cephalometric changes in 28 treated Brazilian children were compared with changes in 28 untreated Class II children and in 28 children with normal occlusion. According to Enlow's counterpart analysis, the 3 groups were not significantly different initially in ramus alignment or relative ramus vertical dimension. These jaw relationships were maintained in both untreated groups. In the treated group, all children had overjet reduction, with correction of the dental arch relationship in 26 of the 28, and there was a significant trend toward a more forward ramus alignment (P =.002) and increased ramus relative vertical dimension (P =.0002). These treatment-induced changes showed a negative correlation with ramus alignment; ie, greater improvement was more likely in children who had backward ramus alignment before treatment and whose Class II malocclusion had not already been intrinsically compensated. Changes in the treated children were similar to but greater than those in the normal children, and different from those in the untreated Class II group. The data suggest that studies of skeletal variations with counterpart analysis can show ramus remodeling compensations from treatment that are missed with conventional cephalometrics.
Similar articles
-
[An eight-factor analysis of early skeletal Class II malocclusion using Fränkel appliance].Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1999 Aug;17(3):271-4. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1999. PMID: 12539305 Chinese.
-
Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Apr;127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.03.028. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005. PMID: 15821690 Clinical Trial.
-
Class II correction in patients treated with class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative study.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Aug;118(2):142-9. doi: 10.1067/mod.2000.104489. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000. PMID: 10935954 Clinical Trial.
-
Meta-analysis of skeletal mandibular changes during Frankel appliance treatment.Eur J Orthod. 2011 Feb;33(1):84-92. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq033. Epub 2010 Jul 16. Eur J Orthod. 2011. PMID: 20639280 Review.
-
An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.Aust Orthod J. 2009 May;25(1):48-58. Aust Orthod J. 2009. PMID: 19634464
Cited by
-
Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 13;3(3):CD003452. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003452.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29534303 Free PMC article.
-
Bone tissue amount related to upper incisors inclination.Angle Orthod. 2014 Mar;84(2):279-85. doi: 10.2319/031213-211.1. Epub 2013 Jul 24. Angle Orthod. 2014. PMID: 23883305 Free PMC article.
-
Anteroposterior length of the maxillary complex and its relationship with the anterior cranial base.Angle Orthod. 2021 Jan 1;91(1):88-97. doi: 10.2319/020520-82.1. Angle Orthod. 2021. PMID: 33289836 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term treatment effects of the FR-2 appliance: a prospective evalution 7 years post-treatment.Eur J Orthod. 2014 Apr;36(2):192-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjt026. Epub 2013 Jun 4. Eur J Orthod. 2014. PMID: 23736378 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Clear aligner mandibular advancement in growing patients with Class II malocclusion.AJO DO Clin Companion. 2023 Apr;3(2):93-109. doi: 10.1016/j.xaor.2023.01.003. Epub 2023 Jan 25. AJO DO Clin Companion. 2023. PMID: 37636594 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources