Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003;21(7):467-75.
doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321070-00002.

Cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplantation: economic implications

Affiliations

Cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplantation: economic implications

Ananya Das. Pharmacoeconomics. 2003.

Abstract

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a pathogen, commonly encountered in the recipients of solid organ transplantation and is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in these patients. CMV infection and disease have been shown to increase the cost of care in transplant recipients and several different strategies of prevention have been shown to be effective in clinical trials. A systematic review of published information on the economic impact of CMV in solid organ transplantation was performed; both clinical- and decision-analysis-based studies were reviewed. Clinical studies have shown that CMV infection and disease is associated with increased length of hospital stay and overall costs. Decision-analysis-based studies suggest that in general, antiviral chemoprophylaxis against CMV in transplant recipients is a cost-effective intervention compared with other established healthcare interventions such as strategies for colorectal cancer screening. Prophylaxis with oral or parenteral ganciclovir is probably the most cost-effective strategy; however, restricting prophylaxis to high-risk groups (such as donor seropositive/recipient seronegative status and the use of an antilymphocyte antibody) or chemoprophylaxis for an extended period does not improve cost effectiveness. Pre-emptive therapy is an evolving strategy for prevention of CMV disease in transplant recipients and is rapidly gaining in popularity. Well-designed trials incorporating prospective cost data and comparing pre-emptive therapy versus conventional antiviral prophylaxis are needed to establish the superiority of one strategy over the other.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Transplantation. 1993 Jun;55(6):1277-82 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1987 Oct 22;317(17):1049-54 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1995 Jul 8;346(8967):69-74 - PubMed
    1. Transplantation. 2000 Feb 15;69(3):357-61 - PubMed
    1. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996 Feb;7(2):325-30 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances