Helping patients make informed choices: a randomized trial of a decision aid for adjuvant chemotherapy in lymph node-negative breast cancer
- PMID: 12697850
- DOI: 10.1093/jnci/95.8.581
Helping patients make informed choices: a randomized trial of a decision aid for adjuvant chemotherapy in lymph node-negative breast cancer
Abstract
Background: In recent years, patients have indicated a desire for more information about their disease and to be involved in making decisions about their care. We developed an aid called the "Decision Board" to help clinicians inform patients with lymph node-negative breast cancer of the risks and benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy. We determined whether adding the Decision Board to the medical consultation improved patient knowledge and satisfaction compared with the medical consultation alone.
Methods: Between October 1995 and March 2000, 176 women with lymph node-negative breast cancer who were candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive the Decision Board plus the medical consultation (83 patients) or the medical consultation alone (93 patients). One week after the consultation, patients completed a questionnaire assessing their knowledge about breast cancer and chemotherapy. Satisfaction with decision making was assessed 1 week and 3, 6, and 12 months after randomization, and differences between groups were analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of variance. All statistical tests were two-sided.
Results: Patients in the Decision Board arm were better informed about breast cancer and adjuvant chemotherapy than patients in the control arm (mean knowledge score = 80.2 [on a scale of 0-100], 95% confidence interval [CI] = 77.1 to 83.3, and 71.7, 95% CI = 69.0 to 74.4, respectively; P<.001). Over the entire study period, satisfaction with decision making was higher for patients in the Decision Board arm than for patients in the control arm (P =.032). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the number of patients who chose adjuvant chemotherapy (77% and 70% for patients in the Decision Board arm and those in the control arm, respectively; P =.303).
Conclusion: When making decisions regarding adjuvant chemotherapy, patients with early breast cancer who had been exposed to the Decision Board had better knowledge of the disease and treatment options and greater satisfaction with their decision making than those who received the standard consultation.
Comment in
-
Standard consultations are not enough to ensure decision quality regarding preference-sensitive options.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Apr 16;95(8):570-1. doi: 10.1093/jnci/95.8.570. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003. PMID: 12697842 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer surgery: a randomized trial.JAMA. 2004 Jul 28;292(4):435-41. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.4.435. JAMA. 2004. PMID: 15280341 Clinical Trial.
-
A decision aid to assist in adjuvant therapy choices for breast cancer.Psychooncology. 2006 Nov;15(11):1001-13. doi: 10.1002/pon.1040. Psychooncology. 2006. PMID: 16511899 Clinical Trial.
-
Offering a choice between two adjuvant chemotherapy regimens: a pilot study to develop a decision aid for women with breast cancer.Patient Educ Couns. 1999 Jul;37(3):283-91. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00117-7. Patient Educ Couns. 1999. PMID: 14528554
-
Adjuvant therapy for breast cancer.NIH Consens Statement. 2000 Nov 1-3;17(4):1-35. NIH Consens Statement. 2000. PMID: 11512506 Review.
-
Decision-making for patients with resectable breast cancer: individualized decisions for and by patients and their physicians.J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2003 Apr;1(2):189-96. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2003.0017. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2003. PMID: 19768877 Review.
Cited by
-
Bridging the age gap in breast cancer: cluster randomized trial of two decision support interventions for older women with operable breast cancer on quality of life, survival, decision quality, and treatment choices.Br J Surg. 2021 May 27;108(5):499-510. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab005. Br J Surg. 2021. PMID: 33760077 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions.Implement Sci. 2006 Aug 9;1:16. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-16. Implement Sci. 2006. PMID: 16899124 Free PMC article.
-
Factors explaining the heterogeneity of effects of patient decision aids on knowledge of outcome probabilities: a systematic review sub-analysis.Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 21;2:95. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-95. Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 24143875 Free PMC article.
-
Provider perspectives on the utility of a colorectal cancer screening decision aid for facilitating shared decision making.Health Expect. 2014 Feb;17(1):27-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00730.x. Epub 2011 Sep 8. Health Expect. 2014. PMID: 21902773 Free PMC article.
-
Clinician-patient communication: a systematic review.Support Care Cancer. 2009 Jun;17(6):627-44. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0601-y. Epub 2009 Mar 4. Support Care Cancer. 2009. PMID: 19259706
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical