Generalization in response to mate recognition signals
- PMID: 12699219
- DOI: 10.1086/367588
Generalization in response to mate recognition signals
Abstract
Females usually exhibit strong and unequivocal recognition of conspecific mating signals and reject those of other sympatric heterospecifics. However, most species are allopatric with one another, and the degree to which females recognize mating signals of allopatric species is more varied. Such mating signals are often rejected but are sometimes falsely recognized as conspecific. We studied the dynamics of mate recognition in female túngara frogs (Physalaemus pustulosus) in response to a series of calls that were intermediate between the conspecific and each of five allopatric-heterospecific calls: two that elicited recognition from females in previous studies and three that did not. This study shows that females perceive variation in allopatric mating signals in acontinuous manner with no evidence of perceptual category formation. The strength of recognition is predicted by how different the target stimulus is from the conspecific call within a series of calls. But the differences in recognition responses among call series are not predicted by the similarity of the call series to the conspecific call. The latter result suggests that the strength of recognition of allopatric signals might be influenced by processes of stimulus generalization and past evolutionary history.
Similar articles
-
Patterns of mating call preferences in túngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus.J Evol Biol. 2007 Nov;20(6):2235-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01420.x. J Evol Biol. 2007. PMID: 17956386
-
Treatment with arginine vasotocin alters mating calls and decreases call attractiveness in male túngara frogs.Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2010 Jan 15;165(2):221-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2009.06.023. Epub 2009 Jul 1. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2010. PMID: 19576218
-
Advertisement-call preferences in diploid-tetraploid treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor): implications for mate choice and the evolution of communication systems.Evolution. 2005 Feb;59(2):395-408. Evolution. 2005. PMID: 15807424
-
Mating vocalizations of female frogs: control and evolutionary mechanisms.Brain Behav Evol. 1999;53(4):187-97. doi: 10.1159/000006594. Brain Behav Evol. 1999. PMID: 10343085 Review.
-
Neurobiology of Female Mate Choice in Frogs: Auditory Filtering and Valuation.Integr Comp Biol. 2017 Oct 1;57(4):857-864. doi: 10.1093/icb/icx098. Integr Comp Biol. 2017. PMID: 29048536 Review.
Cited by
-
Acoustic interference and recognition space within a complex assemblage of dendrobatid frogs.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Oct 11;108(41):17058-63. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1104773108. Epub 2011 Oct 3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011. PMID: 21969562 Free PMC article.
-
Female sexual arousal in amphibians.Horm Behav. 2011 May;59(5):630-6. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.08.015. Epub 2010 Sep 15. Horm Behav. 2011. PMID: 20816968 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Historical contingency affects signaling strategies and competitive abilities in evolving populations of simulated robots.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jan 17;109(3):864-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1104267109. Epub 2012 Jan 3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012. PMID: 22215591 Free PMC article.
-
Sexual selection and 'species recognition' revisited: serial processing and order-of-operations in mate choice.Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Mar 30;289(1971):20212687. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2687. Epub 2022 Mar 23. Proc Biol Sci. 2022. PMID: 35317675 Free PMC article.
-
Female túngara frogs do not experience the continuity illusion.Behav Neurosci. 2016 Feb;130(1):62-74. doi: 10.1037/bne0000115. Epub 2015 Dec 21. Behav Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 26692450 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous