Similar articles

• The prognostic value of calcification and impaired valve motion in combined aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease.

  Eitz T, Kleikamp G, Minami K, Körfer R. Eitz T, et al. J Heart Valve Dis. 2002 Sep;11(5):713-8. J Heart Valve Dis. 2002. PMID: 12358410
• Management of mild to moderate aortic stenosis at the time of coronary artery bypass grafting.

  Filsoufi F, Aklog L, Adams DH, Byrne JG. Filsoufi F, et al. J Heart Valve Dis. 2002 Jan;11 Suppl 1:S45-9. J Heart Valve Dis. 2002. PMID: 11843520 Review.
• [Patient-prosthesis mismatch influence the results of combined aortic valve replacement and coronary bypass grafting].

  Suwalski KB. Suwalski KB. Kardiol Pol. 2009 Aug;67(8):874. Kardiol Pol. 2009. PMID: 19885984 Polish. No abstract available.
• Optimum management of elderly patients with calcified aortic stenosis.

  Kappetein AP, van Geldorp M, Takkenberg JJ, Bogers AJ. Kappetein AP, et al. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2008 Apr;6(4):491-501. doi: 10.1586/14779072.6.4.491. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2008. PMID: 18402539 Review.
• Continuous coronary perfusion in redo aortic valve replacement following prior coronary surgery; an old trick for new dogs?

  Ganesh JS, Bonser RS. Ganesh JS, et al. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Mar;10(3):437-8. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.218503. Epub 2009 Dec 17. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010. PMID: 20019029