Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 May;15(5):503-7.
doi: 10.1097/01.meg.0000059106.41030.8e.

Cardiac output determined by echocardiography in patients with cirrhosis: comparison with the indicator dilution technique

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Cardiac output determined by echocardiography in patients with cirrhosis: comparison with the indicator dilution technique

Ulrik B Andersen et al. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003 May.

Abstract

Background/aims: Measurement of cardiac output in hyperkinetic patients with cirrhosis by Doppler echocardiography is increasingly reported, but has not been validated. We have compared simultaneous measurements of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography (CO(d)) and by the indicator dilution technique (CO(I)).

Methods: Twelve patients with cirrhosis were studied. CO(d) was measured as the spatial mean velocity of the left ventricular outflow tract, multiplied by the cross-sectional area and the heart rate. CO(I) was determined by the standard indicator dilution technique after injection of 125I albumin and 99mTc albumin into the right atrium and subsequent sampling from the femoral artery.

Results: The mean CO(d) and CO(I) were similar (7.20 vs 7.15 l/min, NS). A highly significant correlation was present between CO(d) and CO(I) (r = 0.86, P < 0.0001; slope 0.91, Y(0) = 0.78 l/min). However, the mean squared difference between CO(d) and CO(I) was 2.3 (l/min)2. A Bland-Altman plot revealed no trend with the level of cardiac output. The standard deviation (0.79 vs 0.30 l/min, P < 0.01) and the coefficient of variation (10.5 vs 4.2%, P < 0.01) of duplicate measurements were significantly higher with the Doppler technique.

Conclusion: Doppler measurements of cardiac output in groups of patients with cirrhosis are accurate with respect to the group mean, but marked disagreements of over- and underestimation were seen in individual patients. The reproducibility of the Doppler technique is acceptable, although not as good as that of the indicator dilution technique.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by