Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 May;43(5):495-506.
doi: 10.1002/ajim.10212.

Individual and combined impacts of biomechanical and work organization factors in work-related musculoskeletal symptoms

Affiliations

Individual and combined impacts of biomechanical and work organization factors in work-related musculoskeletal symptoms

Grant D Huang et al. Am J Ind Med. 2003 May.

Abstract

Background: Investigations of work-related low back (LB) and upper extremity (UE) disorders have increasingly utilized multivariable models that include biomechanical/physical and work organization factors. However, the nature of any interactive effects is not well understood.

Methods: Using questionnaires, high and low exposure groups for biomechanical/physical factors, cognitive demands, cognitive processing, interpersonal demands, participatory management, skill discretion, and time pressure for 289 individuals (U.S. Marines) were identified. Musculoskeletal symptom status was also determined by questionnaire. Individual and biomechanical-psychosocial combinations were examined in adjusted multivariable logistic regression analyses.

Results: Time pressure was associated with both LB and UE symptoms (odds ratio(s) (OR) range = 2.13-3.09), while higher biomechanical exposures were risk factors for LB symptoms (OR = 2.07; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.00-4.35) and concurrent LB and UE symptoms (OR = 2.80; CI: 1.35-5.83). Greater risks for concurrent LB and UE symptoms were indicated for combinations involving higher biomechanical exposure and: time pressure (OR = 2.21; CI: 1.19-4.10); cognitive demands (OR = 2.25; CI: 1.23-4.09); cognitive processing (OR = 2.08; CI: 1.16-3.75); interpersonal demands (OR = 2.44; CI: 1.35-4.41); participatory management (OR = 2.50; CI: 1.30-4.81). Results did not suggest any interaction between biomechanical and work organization factors.

Conclusions: While no synergism was indicated, the present findings emphasize the need to consider both biomechanical factors and specific work organization factors, particularly time pressure, in reducing musculoskeletal-related morbidity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources