Effective PSA contamination in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer
- PMID: 12704675
- DOI: 10.1002/ijc.11074
Effective PSA contamination in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer
Abstract
The extent of effective prostate-specific antigen (PSA) contamination in the Rotterdam section of the ongoing European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) trial was evaluated and defined as when opportunistic PSA testing of >/= 3.0 ng/ml was followed by biopsy, similar to the regular procedure within the trial. Records of participants aged 55-74 years at entry were linked to the regional database of the general practitioner (GP) laboratory to obtain PSA tests requested by GPs in the period 1 July 1997 to 31 May 2000 (2.9 years), and to the national pathology database to quantify the number of biopsies. All men randomized were included, only those with prostate cancer screen-detected or clinically diagnosed before July 1997 were omitted from the analyses. 2,895 out of the 14,349 men (20.2%) in the control arm and 1,981 out of the 14,052 men (14.1%) in the screening arm were PSA-tested, at an average annual rate of 73 and 52 per 1,000 person-years, respectively. These rates were higher than those recorded at the national and regional levels, 33 and 38 per 1,000 person-years, respectively. Opportunistic PSA testing in the control arm reached a peak within the first months of randomization, after which it decreased to around 70 per 1,000 person-years. An opposite pattern was observed in the screening arm, where participants already had received the scheduled screening within the trial. The proportion of men in the control arm with PSA >/= 3.0 ng/ml followed by biopsy and prostate cancer was 7-8% and 3%, respectively (3% and 0.4-0.6% in the screening arm), over the whole study period. Over a 4-year rescreening interval, the average PSA and effective contamination amount were approximately 28% and 10%, respectively. PSA testing in the control arm in the Rotterdam ERSPC section is high, but was not followed by a substantial increase in prostate biopsies. Although the reasons for ordering PSA test or indicating biopsy are unknown, effective PSA contamination in the Rotterdam ERSPC section is low and not likely to jeopardize the power of the trial.
Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Extent of prostate-specific antigen contamination in the Spanish section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).Eur Urol. 2006 Dec;50(6):1234-40; discussion 1239-40. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.04.015. Epub 2006 May 3. Eur Urol. 2006. PMID: 16704893 Clinical Trial.
-
Prostate specific antigen testing and digital rectal examination before and during a randomized trial of screening for prostate cancer: European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer, Rotterdam.J Urol. 2000 Oct;164(4):1216-20. J Urol. 2000. PMID: 10992369 Clinical Trial.
-
Long-term prostate-specific antigen contamination in the Spanish arm of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).Actas Urol Esp. 2016 Apr;40(3):164-72. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Nov 24. Actas Urol Esp. 2016. PMID: 26620123 Clinical Trial. English, Spanish.
-
Detection of prostate cancer: the impact of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).Can J Urol. 2005 Feb;12 Suppl 1:2-6; discussion 92-3. Can J Urol. 2005. PMID: 15780157 Review.
-
Defining the optimal prostate-specific antigen threshold for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.Curr Opin Urol. 2009 May;19(3):227-31. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328329a2d0. Curr Opin Urol. 2009. PMID: 19357513 Review.
Cited by
-
Algorithms, nomograms and the detection of indolent prostate cancer.World J Urol. 2008 Oct;26(5):423-9. doi: 10.1007/s00345-008-0278-8. Epub 2008 Jun 7. World J Urol. 2008. PMID: 18536878
-
Low risk research using routinely collected identifiable health information without informed consent: encounters with the Patient Information Advisory Group.J Med Ethics. 2008 Jan;34(1):37-40. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.019661. J Med Ethics. 2008. PMID: 18156520 Free PMC article.
-
Screening for type 2 diabetes in a high-risk population: study design and feasibility of a population-based randomized controlled trial.BMC Public Health. 2012 Aug 17;12:671. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-671. BMC Public Health. 2012. PMID: 22900932 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Cost-effectiveness of prostate cancer screening: a simulation study based on ERSPC data.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Dec 13;107(1):366. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju366. Print 2015 Jan. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014. PMID: 25505238 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of cause of death adjudication on the results of the European prostate cancer screening trial.Br J Cancer. 2017 Jan 3;116(1):141-148. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.378. Epub 2016 Nov 17. Br J Cancer. 2017. PMID: 27855442 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous