Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 May;96(5):1350-1353.
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000055802.27976.8A.

Halothane and isoflurane have additive minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) effects in rats

Affiliations

Halothane and isoflurane have additive minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) effects in rats

Edmond I Eger 2nd et al. Anesth Analg. 2003 May.

Abstract

Studies suggest that at concentrations surrounding MAC (the minimum alveolar concentration suppressing movement in 50% of subjects in response to noxious stimulation), halothane depresses dorsal horn neurons more than does isoflurane. Similarly, these anesthetics may differ in their effects on various receptors and ion channels that might be anesthetic targets. Both findings suggest that these anesthetics may have effects on movement in response to noxious stimulation that would differ from additivity, possibly producing synergism or even antagonism. We tested this possibility in 20 rats. MAC values for halothane and (separately) for isoflurane were determined in duplicate before and after testing the combination (also in duplicate; six determinations of MAC for each rat). The sum of the isoflurane and halothane MAC fractions for individual rats that produced immobility equaled 1.037 +/- 0.082 and did not differ significantly from a value of 1.00. That is, the combination of halothane and isoflurane produced immobility in response to tail clamp at concentrations consistent with simple additivity of the effects of the anesthetics. These results suggest that the immobility produced by inhaled anesthetics need not result from their capacity to suppress transmission through dorsal horn neurons.

Implications: Despite differences in their capacities to inhibit spinal dorsal horn cells, isoflurane and halothane are additive in their ability to suppress movement in response to a noxious stimulus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Antognini JF, Carstens E. Increasing isoflurane from 0.9 to 1.1 minimum alveolar concentration minimally affects dorsal horn cell responses to noxious stimulation. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 208–14.
    1. Jinks S, Antognini JF, Carstens E, et al. Isoflurane can indirectly depress lumbar dorsal horn activity in the goat via action within the brain. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 244–9.
    1. Fairbanks CA, Stone LS, Kitto KF, et al. Alpha(2C)-adrenergic receptors mediate spinal analgesia and adrenergic-opioid synergy. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2002; 300: 282–90.
    1. Nishiyama T, Gyermek L, Lee C, et al. Analgesic interaction between intrathecal midazolam and glutamate receptor antagonists on thermal-induced pain in rats. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 531–7.
    1. Taira Y, Nakakimura K, Matsumoto M, Sakabe T. Spinal and supraspinal midazolam potentiates antinociceptive effects of isoflurane. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85: 881–6.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources