Educating patients about anesthesia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials of media-based interventions
- PMID: 12707146
- DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000055806.93400.93
Educating patients about anesthesia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials of media-based interventions
Abstract
In this systematic review, we compared the effectiveness of media-based patient education about anesthesia. Fifteen randomized controlled trials (n = 1506) were identified after a systematic search of electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PSYCINFO, The Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry), published articles, and contact with authors. Outcomes assessed were anxiety, knowledge, and patient satisfaction. Anxiety levels before anesthesia were less intense in subjects receiving the video and printed information compared with those receiving no intervention (weighted mean difference of 3; 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 1-5 Spielberger's State and Trait Anxiety Inventory). Patients in the video group were more likely to answer all knowledge questions correctly compared with patients with no intervention (relative risk of 6.64; 95%CI, 2.05-21.52). The level of knowledge about pain management was higher in the video group compared with patients with no intervention (weighted mean difference of 17%; 95%CI, 9-25). However, the level of patient satisfaction with the intervention (expectation versus actual anesthetic experience) was similar between the groups (relative risk of 1.06; 95%CI, 0.93-1.22). This systematic review supports the use of video and printed information about general process and risks of anesthesia for patient education before surgery.
Implications: The effectiveness of media-based interventions for educating patients about general process and risks of anesthesia were compared in this systematic review. The use of video and/or printed information can decrease patient anxiety and increase patient knowledge. However, patient satisfaction was similar between media-based intervention and nonintervention groups.
Comment in
-
Poor patient-reported outcome after hip replacement, related to poor perception of perioperative information, commoner in immigrants than in non-immigrants.Acta Orthop. 2016 Jun;87(3):218-24. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1135664. Epub 2016 Feb 5. Acta Orthop. 2016. PMID: 26848766 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Klafta JM, Roizen MF. Current understanding of patients’ attitudes toward and preparation for anesthesia: a review. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 1314–21.
-
- Matthey P, Finucane BT, Finegan BA. The attitude of the general public towards preoperative assessment and risks associated with general anesthesia. Can J Anaesth 2001; 48: 333–9.
-
- Chan CS, Molassiotis A. The effects of an educational programme on the anxiety and satisfaction level of parents having parent present induction and visitation in a postanesthesia care unit. Paediatr Anaesth 2002; 12: 131–9.
-
- Hume MA, Kennedy B, Asbury AJ. Patient knowledge of anesthesia and peri-operative care. Anesthesia 1994; 49: 715–8.
-
- Maranets I, Kain ZN. Preoperative anxiety and intraoperative anesthetic requirements. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 1346–51.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical