Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2003 Apr;92(4):283-93.
doi: 10.1007/s00392-003-0898-3.

[Therapy and risk-stratification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy--a current survey]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Review

[Therapy and risk-stratification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy--a current survey]

[Article in German]
S Reith et al. Z Kardiol. 2003 Apr.

Abstract

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a relatively common disease of the cardiac sarcomere with broad heterogeneity in terms of the disease-causing gene mutation, phenotypic expression, therapy and prognosis. Besides the standard drug treatment, there are several therapeutic options available for severe refractory symptomatic HCM with obstruction. Dual-chamber pacing and transcoronary ablation of septal hypertrophy (TASH) have recently emerged as alternatives to myectomy. However, myectomy remains the current gold standard of therapy for HCM until the promising initial follow-up data for TASH can be transferred into a long-term follow-up period, or prospective randomized comparative trials between these therapies are available. However, even now, TASH represents an important therapeutic alternative in patients with relevant co-morbidities and a high operative risk. Despite significant gradient reduction and amelioration of clinical symptoms, none of these treatment strategies has a proven influence on the natural history of HCM. Hence, regarding the long-term prognosis of the disease, risk stratification of sudden cardiac death using non-invasive risk assessment has become of paramount importance, while genotyping might become the determinant and stratifying marker in the near future. At present, according to secondary prevention, treatment with an implanted cardioverter-defibrillator +/- amiodarone therapy is mandatory, while according to primary prevention treatment should particularly depend on the individual risk profile.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources