Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Apr;18(4):303-12.
doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20633.x.

Rapid magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing cancer-related low back pain

William Hollingworth  1 , Darryl T Gray, Brook I Martin, Sean D Sullivan, Richard A Deyo, Jeffrey G Jarvik
Affiliations

Rapid magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing cancer-related low back pain

William Hollingworth et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: This study compared the relative efficiency of lumbar x-ray and rapid magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for diagnosing cancer-related low back pain (LBP) in primary care patients.

Design: We developed a decision model with Markov state transitions to calculate the cost per case detected and cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) of rapid MR imaging. Model parameters were estimated from the medical literature. The costs of x-ray and rapid MR were calculated in an activity-based costing study.

Setting and patients: A hypothetical cohort of primary care patients with LBP referred for imaging to exclude cancer as the cause of their pain.

Main results: The rapid MR strategy was more expensive due to higher initial imaging costs and larger numbers of patients requiring conventional MR and biopsy. The overall sensitivity of the rapid MR strategy was higher than that of the x-ray strategy (62% vs 55%). However, because of low pre-imaging prevalence of cancer-related LBP, this generates <1 extra case per 1,000 patients imaged. Therefore, the incremental cost per case detected using rapid MR was high ($213,927). The rapid MR strategy resulted in a small increase in quality-adjusted survival (0.00043 QALYs). The estimated incremental cost per QALY for the rapid MR strategy was $296,176.

Conclusions: There is currently not enough evidence to support the routine use of rapid MR to detect cancer as a cause of LBP in primary care patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Decision tree: cost per case detected.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Sensitivity analysis.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Deyo RA, Diehl AK. Cancer as a cause of back pain: frequency, clinical presentation, and diagnostic strategies. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3:230–8. - PubMed
    1. Byrne TN. Spinal cord compression from epidural metastases. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:614–9. - PubMed
    1. Katagiri H, Takahashi M, Inagaki J, et al. Clinical results of nonsurgical treatment for spinal metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;42:1127–32. - PubMed
    1. Maranzano E, Latini P. Effectiveness of radiation therapy without surgery in metastatic spinal cord compression: final results from a prospective trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;32:959–67. - PubMed
    1. Solberg A, Bremnes RM. Metastatic spinal cord compression: diagnostic delay, treatment, and outcome. Anticancer Res. 1999;19:677–84. - PubMed

Publication types