Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Apr 22:4:4.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-4-4. Epub 2003 Apr 22.

A 'real puzzle': the views of patients with epilepsy about the organisation of care

Affiliations

A 'real puzzle': the views of patients with epilepsy about the organisation of care

Glyn Elwyn et al. BMC Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Little is known about how individuals who have a diagnosis of epilepsy have experienced healthcare services or their views about how they should best be organised to meet their ongoing needs.

Methods: Focus group interviews. Individuals with epilepsy were identified in 5 practices in Wales: 90 were invited, 40 confirmed attendance and 19 individuals attended interviews in 5 groups of size 6, 5, 4, 3 and 1 (Table 2).

Inclusion criteria: individuals with a confirmed diagnosis of epilepsy, aged between 18-65. The exclusion criteria were learning disability or an inability to travel to interview locations.

Results: The individuals in these group interviews were not 'epilepsy activists' yet they remained critical in extended discussions about the services encountered during their patient careers, wanting more information and advice about how to adapt to problems, particularly after initial diagnosis, more involvement in decision making, rapid access to expertise, preferably local, and improved communication between clinicians. A central concern was the tendency for concerns to be silenced, either overtly, or covertly by perceived haste, so that they felt marginalised, despite their own claims to own expert personal knowledge.

Conclusions: Users of existing services for epilepsy are critical of current systems, especially the lack of attention given to providing information, psychosocial support and the wishes of patients to participate in decision making. Any reorganisation of services for individuals with epilepsy should take into account these perceived problems as well as try to reconcile the tension between the distant and difficult to access expertise of specialists and the local but unconfident support of generalists. The potential benefit of harnessing information technology to allow better liaison should be investigated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ministry of Health. National Assitance Act 1948: Welfare of Handicapped Persons: the special needs of epileptics and spastics. Ministry of Health: London. 1953.
    1. Reid JA. People with epilepsy: report of a Joint Sub-Committee of the Standing Medical Advisory Committee and the Advisory Committee on the Health of Handicapped Persons. Central Health Services Council: London. 1969.
    1. Winterton PMC. Report of the working group on services for people with epilepsy: a report to the Department of Health and Social Security. The Department of Education and Science and the Welsh Office HMSO: London. 1986.
    1. Clinical Standards Advisory Group. Services for Patients with Epilepsy. Clinical Standards Advisory Group: London. 1999.
    1. Thapar AK. Care of patients with epilepsy in the community: will new initiatives address old problems. Br J Gen Pract. 1996;46:37–42. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types