Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 May;47(5):1598-603.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.5.1598-1603.2003.

Daptomycin dose-effect relationship against resistant gram-positive organisms

Affiliations

Daptomycin dose-effect relationship against resistant gram-positive organisms

Raymond Cha et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 May.

Abstract

Daptomycin exhibits in vitro bactericidal activity against clinically significant gram-positive bacteria. We employed pharmacodynamic modeling to determine a once-daily dosing regimen of daptomycin that correlates to pharmacodynamic endpoints for different resistant gram-positive clinical strains. An in vitro pharmacodynamic model with an initial inoculum of 6 log(10) CFU/ml was used to simulate daptomycin regimens ranging in dose from 0 to 9 mg/kg of body weight/day, with corresponding exposures reflecting free-daptomycin concentrations in serum. Bacterial density was profiled over 48 h for two methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA-67 and -R515), two glycopeptide intermediate-resistant S. aureus (GISA-992 and -147398), and two vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF-12366 and -SF12047) strains. A sigmoid dose-response model was used to estimate the effective dose required to achieve 50% (ED(50)) and 80% (ED(80)) bacterial density reduction at 48 h. Daptomycin MICs for study isolates ranged from 0.125 to 4 micro g/ml. Model fitting resulted in an r(2) of >0.80 for all tested isolates. Control growths at 48 h ranged from 7.3 to 8.5 log(10) CFU/ml. Sigmoid relationships were not superimposable between categorical resistant species: ED(50) and ED(80) values were 1.9 and 3.1, 4.2 and 5.6, and 5.4 and 6.8 mg/kg for MRSA, GISA, and VREF isolates, respectively. Doses required to achieve ED(50) and ED(80) values correlated with MIC differences between tested organisms. Corresponding area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h/MIC exposure ratios demonstrated a wide range of ED(80) values among the tested isolates. Doses ranging between 3 and 7 mg/kg produced significant bactericidal activity (ED(80)) against these multidrug-resistant S. aureus and E. faecium isolates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Pharmacodynamic time-kill analysis of MRSA-67. GC, growth control; D1 through D6, daptomycin at dose regimens ranging from 1 to 6 mg/kg every 24 h.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Pharmacodynamic time-kill analysis of GISA-992. GC, growth control; D2 through D8, daptomycin at dose regimens simulating 2 to 8 mg/kg every 24 h.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
Pharmacodynamic time-kill analysis of VREF-12366. GC, growth control; D3 through D9, daptomycin at dose regimens simulating 3 to 9 mg/kg every 24 h.
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic dose modeling to effect for MRSA isolates. ED50, dose correlating to 50% bacterial density reduction from growth control; ED80, dose correlating to 80% bacterial density reduction from growth control. •, MRSA-67 bacterial densities at 48 h; ○, MRSA-R515 bacterial densities at 48 h.
FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.
Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic dose modeling to effect for GISA isolates. ED50, dose correlating to 50% bacterial density reduction from growth control; ED80, dose correlating to 80% bacterial density reduction from growth control. •, GISA-992 bacterial densities at 48 h; ○, GISA-147398 bacterial densities at 48 h.
FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.
Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic dose modeling to effect for VREF isolates. ED50, dose correlating to 50% bacterial density reduction from growth control; ED80, dose correlating to 80% bacterial density reduction from growth control. •, VREF-12366 bacterial densities at 48 h; ○, VREF-SF12047 bacterial densities at 48 h.

References

    1. Aeschlimann, J. R., Hershberger, E., and M. J. Rybak. 1999. Analysis of vancomycin population susceptibility profiles, killing activity, and postantibiotic effect against vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1914-1918. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akins, R. L., and M. J. Rybak. 2000. In vitro activities of daptomycin, arbekacin, vancomycin, and gentamicin alone and/or in combination against glycopeptide intermediate-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an infection model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:1925-1929. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1998. Summary of notifiable diseases, United States. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 47:19.
    1. Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention. 1997. Interim guidelines for prevention and control of staphylococcal infection associated with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 46:626-628, 635. - PubMed
    1. Garrett, D. O., E. Jochimsen, K. Murfitt, B. Hill, S. McAllister, P. Nelson, R. V. Spera, R. K. Sall, F. C. Tenover, J. Johnston, B. Zimmer, and W. R. Jarvis. 1999. The emergence of decreased susceptibility to vancomycin in Staphylococcus epidermidis. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 20:167-170. - PubMed

MeSH terms