Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 May 1;31(9):2443-50.
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg340.

Topological structure analysis of the protein-protein interaction network in budding yeast

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Topological structure analysis of the protein-protein interaction network in budding yeast

Dongbo Bu et al. Nucleic Acids Res. .

Abstract

Interaction detection methods have led to the discovery of thousands of interactions between proteins, and discerning relevance within large-scale data sets is important to present-day biology. Here, a spectral method derived from graph theory was introduced to uncover hidden topological structures (i.e. quasi-cliques and quasi-bipartites) of complicated protein-protein interaction networks. Our analyses suggest that these hidden topological structures consist of biologically relevant functional groups. This result motivates a new method to predict the function of uncharacterized proteins based on the classification of known proteins within topological structures. Using this spectral analysis method, 48 quasi-cliques and six quasi-bipartites were isolated from a network involving 11,855 interactions among 2617 proteins in budding yeast, and 76 uncharacterized proteins were assigned functions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The topological structures of protein–protein interaction networks. In a quasi-clique, proteins tend to interact with each other (a), while in a quasi-bipartite, proteins between sets have denser interactions than those within sets (b).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The percentage of functional classes of the 48 quasi-cliques. Distribution of the following three classes: main function, percentage of the proteins that have the main function; unknown function, percentage of the uncharacterized proteins; and discordant function, percentage of the proteins that have discordant functions.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison between function prediction and experimental annotation for small subunit (SSU) processome. (A) SSU processome that is supported by experimental evidence (the yellow and the green proteins); (B) our predictions based on quasi-clique 3 (the red proteins and the yellow proteins). The yellow ones are the overlap of (A) and (B). This suggests that our prediction is partly consistent with the experimental evidence (31).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison of different visual representations with and without topological structure. The original protein–protein interaction network is rather miscellaneous and difficult to assimilate (a). The spectral analysis revealed a hidden topological structure underlying the miscellaneous network (b).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fields S. (1997) The future is function. Nature Genet., 15, 325–327. - PubMed
    1. Rain J.C., Selig,L., De Reuse,H., Battaglia,V., Reverdy,C., Simon,S., Lenzen,G., Petel,F., Wojcik,J., Schachter,V., Chemama,Y., Labigne,A. and Legrain,P. (2001) The protein–protein interaction map of Helicobacter pylori. Nature, 409, 211–215. - PubMed
    1. Gavin A.C., Bosche,M., Krause,R., Grandi,P., Marzioch,M., Bauer,A., Schultz,J., Rick,J.M., Michon,A.M., Cruciat,C.M. et al. (2002) Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature, 415, 141–147. - PubMed
    1. von Mering C., Krause,R., Snel,B., Cornell,M., Oliver,S.G., Fields,S. and Bork,P. (2002) Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein–protein interactions. Nature, 417, 399–403. - PubMed
    1. Uetz P., Giot,L., Cagney,G., Mansfield,T.A., Judson,R.S., Narayan,V., Lockshon,D., Srinivasan,M., Pochart,P. et al. (2000) A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature, 403, 623–627. - PubMed

Publication types