Interaction between Smad-interacting protein-1 and the corepressor C-terminal binding protein is dispensable for transcriptional repression of E-cadherin
- PMID: 12714599
- DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M300597200
Interaction between Smad-interacting protein-1 and the corepressor C-terminal binding protein is dispensable for transcriptional repression of E-cadherin
Abstract
deltaEF1 and SIP1 (or Zfhx1a and Zfhx1b, respectively) are the only known members of the vertebrate Zfh1 family of homeodomain/zinc finger-containing proteins. Similar to other transcription factors, both Smad-interacting protein-1 (SIP1) and deltaEF1 are capable of repressing E-cadherin transcription through binding to the E2 boxes located in its promoter. In the case of deltaEF1, this repression has been proposed to occur via interaction with the corepressor C-terminal binding protein (CtBP). In this study, we show by coimmunoprecipitation that SIP1 and CtBP interact in vivo and that an isolated CtBP-binding SIP1 fragment depends on CtBP for transcriptional repression. However, and most importantly, full-length SIP1 and deltaEF1 proteins do not depend on their interaction with CtBP to repress transcription from the E-cadherin promoter. Furthermore, in E-cadherin-positive kidney epithelial cells, the conditional synthesis of mutant SIP1 that cannot bind to CtBP abrogates endogenous E-cadherin expression in a similar way as wild-type SIP1. Our results indicate that full-length SIP1 can repress E-cadherin in a CtBP-independent manner.
Similar articles
-
Pc2-mediated sumoylation of Smad-interacting protein 1 attenuates transcriptional repression of E-cadherin.J Biol Chem. 2005 Oct 21;280(42):35477-89. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M504477200. Epub 2005 Aug 1. J Biol Chem. 2005. PMID: 16061479
-
New mode of DNA binding of multi-zinc finger transcription factors: deltaEF1 family members bind with two hands to two target sites.EMBO J. 1999 Sep 15;18(18):5073-84. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.18.5073. EMBO J. 1999. PMID: 10487759 Free PMC article.
-
The interaction of the carboxyl terminus-binding protein with the Smad corepressor TGIF is disrupted by a holoprosencephaly mutation in TGIF.J Biol Chem. 2000 Dec 15;275(50):39762-6. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C000416200. J Biol Chem. 2000. PMID: 10995736
-
SIP1 (Smad interacting protein 1) and deltaEF1 (delta-crystallin enhancer binding factor) are structurally similar transcriptional repressors.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A Suppl 1(Pt 1):S40-7. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001. PMID: 11263664 Review.
-
Transcriptional regulation by C-terminal binding proteins.Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2007;39(9):1593-607. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2007.01.025. Epub 2007 Feb 4. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2007. PMID: 17336131 Review.
Cited by
-
Protein expression of ZEB2 in renal cell carcinoma and its prognostic significance in patient survival.PLoS One. 2013 May 2;8(5):e62558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062558. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23658743 Free PMC article.
-
Emerging mechanisms progress of colorectal cancer liver metastasis.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Dec 8;13:1081585. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1081585. eCollection 2022. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 36568117 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Four amino acids within a tandem QxVx repeat in a predicted extended α-helix of the Smad-binding domain of Sip1 are necessary for binding to activated Smad proteins.PLoS One. 2013 Oct 11;8(10):e76733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076733. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24146916 Free PMC article.
-
ZEB1 in Pancreatic Cancer.Cancers (Basel). 2010 Aug 18;2(3):1617-28. doi: 10.3390/cancers2031617. Cancers (Basel). 2010. PMID: 24281177 Free PMC article.
-
Revisiting epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer metastasis: the connection between epithelial plasticity and stemness.Mol Oncol. 2017 Jul;11(7):792-804. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12096. Epub 2017 Jun 26. Mol Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28649800 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials