Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003;31(6):361-5.
doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(03)70699-4.

[Use of anti-aggregant drugs in primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention in diabetics in town and country in the León area]

[Article in Spanish]
Affiliations

[Use of anti-aggregant drugs in primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention in diabetics in town and country in the León area]

[Article in Spanish]
J López De La Iglesia et al. Aten Primaria. 2003.

Abstract

Objectives: To find how many diabetics should receive anti-aggregant treatment according to the recommendations made since 2001 by the American Diabetes Association (ADA), how many cardiovascular events could be avoided by 100 mg daily of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), and the cost per event avoided by this measure.

Design: Transversal, descriptive, multi-centre study. SETTING. Primary care. 8 clinics in 5 health districts (3 rural, 1 semi-urban, 4 urban) in the León area. PARTICIPANTS. Diabetics aged 14 or over diagnosed through the ADA criteria since 1997. MAIN MEASUREMENTS. Audit of clinical records, collecting age and sex, the presence of the criteria of the ADA for anti-aggregation, the existence of established cardiovascular disease (CVD) and the anti-aggregant treatment patients receive. RESULTS. 544 diabetics. 97.2% (95% CI, 95.8%-98.6%) comply with anti-aggregation criteria. 101 had established CVD (18.6%; CI, 15.3%-21.9%); 77.2% received anti-aggregants (CI, 73.7%-80.7%).428 had no CVD and did have anti-aggregation criteria (78.7%; CI, 75.3%-82.1%); 9.3% (CI, 6.9%-11.7%) received treatment. CONCLUSIONS. There was basically little follow-up of the ADA anti-aggregation recommendations in primary prevention. Treatment of our diabetics with 100 mg/day of ASA would avoid 7.64 cardiovascular events in five years (CI, 5.56-9.72). The cost per cardiovascular event avoided was 6,625.37 euros (CI, 4821.60-8429.14 euros).

Objetivo: Conocer cuántos diabéticos deberían recibir tratamiento antiagregante según las recomendaciones que desde 2001 hace la American Diabetes Association (ADA), cuántos episodios cardiovasculares podrían evitarse con 100 mg diarios de ácido acetilsalicílico (AAS) y cuál sería el coste por episodio evitado con esta medida.

Diseño: Estudio multicéntrico descriptivo transversal.

Emplazamiento: Atención primaria: 8 consultas de 5 zonas básicas de salud (3 rurales, una semiurbana, 4 urbanas) del área de León.

Participantes: Pacientes diabéticos de 14 o más años diagnosticados con los criterios de la ADA de 1997.

Mediciones principales: Auditoría de historias clínicas en la que se recogieron los siguientes datos: edad y sexo, presencia de aquellos criterios a los que hace referencia la ADA para antiagregación, existencia de enfermedad cardiovascular (ECV) establecida y tratamiento antiagregante que reciben los pacientes.

Resultados: Un total de 544 pacientes diabéticos (97,2%; IC del 95%, 95,8-98,6) cumplen criterios de antiagregación.

Un total de 101 pacientes tienen una ECV establecida (18,6%; IC del 95%, 15,3-21,9); reciben antiagregantes el 77,2% (IC del 95%, 73,7-80,7).

Un total de 428 pacientes no presentan ECV y sí criterios de antiagregación (78,7%; IC del 95%, 75,3-82,1); el 9,3% (IC del 95%, 6,9-11,7) recibe tratamiento.

Conclusiones: Escaso seguimiento de las recomendaciones de antiagregación de la ADA, fundamentalmente en prevención primaria.

Tratando a nuestros diabéticos con 100 mg/día de AAS se evitarían 7,64 episodios cardiovasculares en 5 años (IC del 95%, 5,56-9,72).

El coste por episodio cardiovascular evitado es de 6.625,37 € (IC del 95%, 4.821,60-8.429,14 €).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Haffner S.M., Lehto S., Ronnemaa T., Pyorala K., Laakso M. Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:229–234. - PubMed
    1. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) JAMA. 2001;285:2486–2497. - PubMed
    1. Evans J.M., Wang J., Morris A.D. Comparison of cardiovascular risk between patients with type 2 diabetes and those who had had a myocardial infarction: cross sectional and cohort studies. BMJ. 2002;324:939–943. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levin R.D., Kwaan H.C., Dobbie J.G., Fetkenhour C.L., Traisman H.S. Partial purification and studies of the plasma co-factor that potentiates platelet aggregation in diabetes mellitus. J Lab Clin Med. 1981;98:519–526. - PubMed
    1. Collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy- I: prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke by prolonged antiplatelet therapy in various categories of patients Antiplatelet Trialists’ Collaboration. BMJ. 1994;308:81–106. - PMC - PubMed