Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 May;9(5):961-4.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i5.961.

Dose surgical sub-specialization influence survival in patients with colorectal cancer?

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Dose surgical sub-specialization influence survival in patients with colorectal cancer?

Cameron Platell et al. World J Gastroenterol. 2003 May.

Abstract

Aim: To perform a review of patients with colorectal cancer to a community hospital and to compare the risk-adjusted survival between patients managed in general surgical units versus a colorectal unit.

Methods: The study evaluated all patients with colorectal cancer referred to either general surgical units or a colorectal unit from 1/1996 to 6/2001. These results were compared to a historical control group treated within general surgical units at the same hospital from 1/1989 to 12/1994. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis compared the overall survivals (all-cause mortality) between the groups. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the influence of a number of independent variables on survival. These variables included age, ASA score, disease stage, emergency surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, disease location, and surgical unit.

Results: There were 974 patients involved in this study. There were no significant differences in the demographic details for the three groups. Patients in the colorectal group were more likely to have rectal cancer and Stage I cancers, and less likely to have Stage II cancers. Patients treated in the colorectal group had a significantly higher overall 5-year survival when compared with the general surgical group and the historical control group (56 % versus 45 % and 40 % respectively, P<0.01). Survival regression analysis identified age, ASA score, disease stage, adjuvant chemotherapy, and treatment in a colorectal unit (Hazards ratio: 0.67; 95 % CI: 0.53 to 0.84, P =0.0005), as significant independent predictors of survival.

Conclusion: The results suggest that there may be a survival advantage for patients with colon and rectal cancers being treated within a specialist colorectal surgical unit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • The Colorectal Anastomosis: A Timeless Challenge.
    Gaidarski Iii AA, Ferrara M. Gaidarski Iii AA, et al. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2022 Dec 9;36(1):11-28. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1756510. eCollection 2023 Jan. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2022. PMID: 36619283 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Workload and surgeon's specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery.
    Archampong D, Borowski D, Wille-Jørgensen P, Iversen LH. Archampong D, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD005391. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005391.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 22419309 Free PMC article.
  • Report from the OECI Oncology Days 2014.
    van Harten W, Stanta G, Bussolati G, Riegman P, Hoefler G, Becker K, Folprecht G, Truini M, Haybaeck J, Buiga R, Dono M, Bagg A, López Guerrero J, Zupo S, Lemare F, de Lorenzo F, Goedbloed N, Razavi D, Lövey J, Cadariu P, Rollandi G, Paparo F, Pierotti M, Ciuleanu T, De Paoli P, Weiner G, Saghatchian M, Lombardo C. van Harten W, et al. Ecancermedicalscience. 2014 Dec 31;8:496. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2014.496. eCollection 2014. Ecancermedicalscience. 2014. PMID: 25624877 Free PMC article.
  • Socioeconomic and geographic determinants of survival of patients with digestive cancer in France.
    Dejardin O, Remontet L, Bouvier AM, Danzon A, Trétarre B, Delafosse P, Molinié F, Maarouf N, Velten M, Sauleau EA, Bourdon-Raverdy N, Grosclaude P, Boutreux S, De Pouvourville G, Launoy G. Dejardin O, et al. Br J Cancer. 2006 Oct 9;95(7):944-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603335. Epub 2006 Sep 12. Br J Cancer. 2006. PMID: 16969351 Free PMC article.
  • Prognostic factors in 165 elderly colorectal cancer patients.
    Nan KJ, Qin HX, Yang G. Nan KJ, et al. World J Gastroenterol. 2003 Oct;9(10):2207-10. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i10.2207. World J Gastroenterol. 2003. PMID: 14562379 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Porter GA, Soskolne CL, Yakimets WW, Newman SC. Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 1998;227:157–167. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, Hur K, Hossain M, Soybel D, Kizer KW, Aust JB, Bell RH, Chong V, et al. Relation of surgical volume to outcome in eight common operations: results from the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 1999;230:414–429; discussion 429-432. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singh KK, Barry MK, Ralston P, Henderson MA, McCormick JS, Walls AD, Auld CD. Audit of colorectal cancer surgery by non-specialist surgeons. Br J Surg. 1997;84:343–347. - PubMed
    1. Nhmrc . 1999. Guidelines for the prevention, early detection and management of colorectal cancer.
    1. Platell C. A community-based hospital experience with colorectal cancer. Aust N Z J Surg. 1997;67:420–423. - PubMed

Publication types