Femoral exchange nailing for aseptic non-union: not the end to all problems
- PMID: 12719163
- DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(02)00191-2
Femoral exchange nailing for aseptic non-union: not the end to all problems
Abstract
We report the results of a single centre prospective study of exchange nailing for aseptic non-union of a femoral fracture. Eighteen patients with 19 aseptic femoral non-unions had exchange nailing performed in our institution. We collected data on mechanism of injury, original fracture type, and indication for exchange nailing, further surgery and major complications. In 11 non-unions (58%), the exchange nail procedure alone resulted in fracture union with a mean time to radiographic union of 9 months (range 3-24 months). The non-union did not heal in five patients, two patients developed an infected non-union, and one patient required dynamisation of the exchange nail. Fracture healing was eventually achieved in 18 non-unions (95%). Complications following exchange nailing occurred in 11 fractures (58%), in which further surgery was required (four repeat exchange nailings, two Ilizarov frame applications and five nail removals). The role of reamed exchange nailing in the treatment of femoral non-union needs to be re-evaluated. Although fracture healing is eventually achieved in most patients, a significant number of them required additional surgery to achieve union or to deal with complications arising from the exchange nailing.
Similar articles
-
Success of exchange reamed intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft nonunion or delayed union.J Orthop Trauma. 2000 Mar-Apr;14(3):178-82. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200003000-00005. J Orthop Trauma. 2000. PMID: 10791668
-
Failure of exchange reamed intramedullary nails for ununited femoral shaft fractures.J Orthop Trauma. 2000 Jun-Jul;14(5):335-8. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200006000-00005. J Orthop Trauma. 2000. PMID: 10926240
-
Effectiveness of exchange K-nail and augmented plating in aseptic femoral diaphyseal non-union.Injury. 2017 Aug;48 Suppl 2:S61-S65. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(17)30496-5. Injury. 2017. PMID: 28802423
-
Treatment of aseptic non-union after intramedullary nailing without removal of the nail.Injury. 2017 Jun;48 Suppl 1:S76-S81. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.022. Epub 2017 May 6. Injury. 2017. PMID: 28487102 Review.
-
Exchange Nailing for Hypertrophic Femoral Nonunion.J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Aug;31 Suppl 3:S23-S25. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000905. J Orthop Trauma. 2017. PMID: 28697079 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparing Augmentative Plating and Exchange Nailing for the Treatment of Nonunion of Femoral Shaft Fracture after Intramedullary Nailing: A Meta-analysis.Orthop Surg. 2020 Feb;12(1):50-57. doi: 10.1111/os.12580. Epub 2020 Jan 1. Orthop Surg. 2020. PMID: 31894655 Free PMC article.
-
High rate of complications with exchange nailing for femoral nonunions.OTA Int. 2025 Mar 7;8(2):e387. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000387. eCollection 2025 Jun. OTA Int. 2025. PMID: 40061869 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Interlocking Mode on the Outcomes of Exchange Nailing for the Treatment of Aseptic Femoral Shaft Nonunion.Clin Orthop Surg. 2023 Feb;15(1):13-19. doi: 10.4055/cios22195. Epub 2023 Jan 13. Clin Orthop Surg. 2023. PMID: 36778995 Free PMC article.
-
Augmentative locking plate with autologous bone grafting for distal femoral nonunion subsequent to failed retrograde intramedullary nailing.Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016 Aug;50(4):393-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 Jun 3. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016. PMID: 27449592 Free PMC article.
-
Factors associated with development of re-nonunion after primary revision in femoral shaft nonunion subsequent to failed intramedullary nailing.J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Jul 20;13(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0886-y. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018. PMID: 30029657 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical