Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2003 May;56(5):389-93.
doi: 10.1136/jcp.56.5.389.

The role of antitissue transglutaminase assay for the diagnosis and monitoring of coeliac disease: a French-Italian multicentre study

E Tonutti  1 , D Visentini, N Bizzaro, M Caradonna, L Cerni, D Villalta, R Tozzoli; French-Italian Laboratory Study Group on Coeliac Disease
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

The role of antitissue transglutaminase assay for the diagnosis and monitoring of coeliac disease: a French-Italian multicentre study

E Tonutti et al. J Clin Pathol. 2003 May.

Abstract

Aims: Tissue transglutaminase (tTG) was recently identified as the major autoantigen in coeliac disease. The aim of this multicentre study was to evaluate the impact of a new immunoenzymatic assay for the detection of IgA anti-tGT antibodies.

Methods: Seventy four Italian and French clinical laboratories participated in this study; anti-tTG IgA with an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method using guinea pig liver extract as the coating antigen, anti-endomysium IgA autoantibodies (EMA), and total serum IgA were determined in 7948 patients, 1162 of whom had coeliac disease (737 untreated cases and 425 on a gluten free diet). A proportion of the sera were then sent to a reference laboratory for anti-tTG retesting with an ELISA method using recombinant human tTG antigen.

Results: Seven thousand four hundred and fifty eight (93.8%) sera were EMA/antiguinea pig tTG concordant (positive or negative); 490 (6.2%) were non-concordant. The sensitivity of EMA and antiguinea pig tTG in the 737 untreated patients with coeliac disease was 92.1% and 94.8%, respectively, and the specificity was 99.8% and 99.2%, respectively. Retesting of the discordant sera showed that of the 162 sera classified as EMA negative/antiguinea pig tTG positive, only 49 were positive for human recombinant anti-tTG, and that 39 of these were also EMA positive. Furthermore, of the 36 sera classified as EMA positive/antiguinea pig tTG negative, only two were confirmed as EMA positive.

Conclusions: The antiguinea pig tTG assay is more sensitive but less specific than EMA, whereas the antihuman recombinant tTG assay is far more specific and just as sensitive as antiguinea pig tTG. Testing for EMA presents considerable interpretative problems and is difficult to standardise.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of test results according to the clinical diagnosis. CD, coeliac disease; EMA, anti-endomysium antibodies; GFD, gluten free diet; tTGgp, guinea pig tissue transglutaminase.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Godkin A, Jewell D. The pathogenesis of celiac disease. Gastroenterology 1998;115:206–10. - PubMed
    1. Marsh MN. Gluten, major histocompatibility and the small intestine: a molecular and immunobiological approach to the spectrum of gluten sensitivity (celiac sprue). Gastroenterology 1992;102:330–53. - PubMed
    1. Stern M and the Working Group on Serologic Screening for Celiac Disease. Comparative evaluation of serologic tests for celiac disease: a European initiative toward standardization. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2000;31:513–19. - PubMed
    1. Burgin-Wolff A, Gaze H, Hadziselimovic F, et al. Antigliadin and antiendomysium antibody determination for coeliac disease. Arch Dis Child 1991;66:941–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burgin-Wolff A, Hadziselimovic F. Screening test for coeliac diease. Lancet 1997;349:1843–4. - PubMed

Publication types