Similar articles

• Surgical outcome of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: summary of early multiinstitutional experience in Japan.

  Egawa S, Arai Y, Kawakita M, Matsuda T, Tanaka M, Naito S, Okumura K, Terachi T, Hayami S, Suzuki K, Gotoh M, Ono Y, Baba S. Egawa S, et al. Int J Clin Oncol. 2003 Apr;8(2):97-103. doi: 10.1007/s101470300017. Int J Clin Oncol. 2003. PMID: 12720102
• Classification system: organ preserving treatment for prostate cancer.

  Ward JF, Jones JS. Ward JF, et al. Urology. 2010 Jun;75(6):1258-60. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.10.044. Epub 2010 Jan 18. Urology. 2010. PMID: 20080292 No abstract available.
• Editorial comment on: Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.

  Cestari A, Guazzoni G. Cestari A, et al. Eur Urol. 2009 Jun;55(6):1367. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.12.039. Epub 2009 Jan 9. Eur Urol. 2009. PMID: 19147271 No abstract available.
• Role of pelvic lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer management.

  Sivalingam S, Oxley J, Probert JL, Stolzenburg JU, Schwaibold H. Sivalingam S, et al. Urology. 2007 Feb;69(2):203-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.10.031. Urology. 2007. PMID: 17320652 Review. No abstract available.
• Robotic radical prostatectomy: present and future.

  Bianco FJ. Bianco FJ. Arch Esp Urol. 2011 Oct;64(8):839-46. Arch Esp Urol. 2011. PMID: 22052765 Review. English, Spanish.