Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 May;93(5):798-802.
doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.5.798.

Markers of access to and quality of primary care for aboriginal people in Ontario, Canada

Affiliations

Markers of access to and quality of primary care for aboriginal people in Ontario, Canada

Baiju R Shah et al. Am J Public Health. 2003 May.

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated primary care accessibility and quality for Ontario's aboriginal population.

Methods: We compared a defined aboriginal cohort with nonaboriginal populations with analogous geographic isolation and low socioeconomic status. We determined rates of hospitalization for the following indicators of adequacy of primary care: ambulatory care-sensitive (ACS) conditions and utilization of referral care-sensitive (RCS) procedures from administrative databases.

Results: ACS hospitalization rates, relative to the general population, were 2.54, 1.50, and 1.14 for the aboriginal population, the geographic control populations, and the socioeconomic control populations, respectively. The relative RCS procedure utilization rates were 0.64, 0.91, and 1.00, respectively.

Conclusions: The increased ACS hospitalization rate and reduced RCS procedure utilization rate suggest that northern Ontario's aboriginal residents have insufficient or ineffective primary care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
—Relative admission rates for ambulatory care–sensitive conditions for the aboriginal population and the geographic and socioeconomic control populations, compared with the general population: Ontario, Canada, 1994–1995 and 1998–1999.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
—Relative utilization rates for referral care–sensitive procedures for the aboriginal population and the geographic and socioeconomic control populations, compared with the general population: Ontario, Canada, 1994–1995 and 1998–1999.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
—Relative admission rates for insensitive conditions for the aboriginal population and the geographic and socioeconomic control populations, compared with the general population: Ontario, Canada, 1994–1995 and 1998–1999.

References

    1. Caper P. The microanatomy of health care. Health Aff. 1993;12:174–177. - PubMed
    1. Billings J, Zeitel L, Lukomnik J, Carey TS, Blank AE, Newman L. Impact of socioeconomic status on hospital use in New York City. Health Aff. 1993;12:162–173. - PubMed
    1. Weissman JS, Gatsonis C, Epstein AM. Rates of avoidable hospitalization by insurance status in Massachusetts and Maryland. JAMA. 1992;268:2388–2394. - PubMed
    1. Bindman AB, Grumbach K, Osmond D, et al. Preventable hospitalizations and access to health care. JAMA. 1995;274:305–311. - PubMed
    1. Laditka SB, Laditka JN. Geographic variation in preventable hospitalization of older women and men: implications for access to primary health care. J Women Aging. 1999;11:43–56. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources