Evaluation of oral and subcutaneous delivery of an experimental canarypox recombinant canine distemper vaccine in the Siberian polecat (Mustela eversmanni)
- PMID: 12723797
- DOI: 10.1638/1042-7260(2003)34[0025:EOOASD]2.0.CO;2
Evaluation of oral and subcutaneous delivery of an experimental canarypox recombinant canine distemper vaccine in the Siberian polecat (Mustela eversmanni)
Abstract
We assessed the safety and efficacy of an experimental canarypox-vectored recombinant canine distemper virus (CDV) subunit vaccine in the Siberian polecat (Mustela eversmanni), a close relative of the black-footed ferret, (M. nigripes), an endangered species that is highly susceptible to the virus. Siberian polecats were randomized into six treatment groups. Recombinant canine distemper vaccine was administered s.c. at three dose levels (10(4.5), 10(5.0), and 10(5.5) plaque-forming units [PFU] per dose) and was administered orally by spraying the vaccine into the oropharnyx at two dose levels (10(5.5), 10(8.0) PFU per dose). The sixth group of control animals was not vaccinated. For both routes of administration, two 1-ml doses of reconstituted vaccine were delivered 4 wk apart, followed by live virus challenge 3 wk after the second vaccination. During the challenge, Synder Hill test strain CDV obtained from the National Veterinary Services Laboratory in Ames, Iowa, was administered i.p. Serial blood samples for CDV serology were collected immediately before vaccination and challenge, and 10, 15, and 20 days after challenge. Clinical signs and body weights were recorded up to 32 days after challenge. The survival rate in animals receiving vaccine at the highest oral dose (10(8.0) PFU per dose) was 83.3%. Survival rate was 50.0% in the high s.c. and 60.0% in the medium s.c. groups. All animals in the low-s.c. dose, low-oral dose, and control groups died after exposure. Vaccine dose overall (oral and s.c.) and dose in response to s.c. administration when considered alone were significant predictors of survival (P = 0.006 and P = 0.04, respectively). Among the polecats challenged with virulent virus, those that died became sick sooner than those that survived. Animals that died lost significantly more weight during the 10 days after challenge than did animals that survived (P = 0.02). Survival rates did not differ by sex, founder female status, or breeding pedigree in any of the treatment groups. Survival rates were higher in animals with increasing serum neutralization titers (P = 0.027). This study demonstrates the efficacy of oral delivery of a recombinant CDV vaccine in the Siberian polecat. Further studies are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of vectored recombinant vaccines in highly susceptible species and especially in those species in which vaccination with modified live CDV has led to disease.
Similar articles
-
Vaccination of black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes) x Siberian polecat (M. eversmanni) hybrids and domestic ferrets (M. putorius furo)against canine distemper.J Wildl Dis. 1996 Jul;32(3):417-23. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-32.3.417. J Wildl Dis. 1996. PMID: 8827666
-
Protection of dogs against canine distemper by vaccination with a canarypox virus recombinant expressing canine distemper virus fusion and hemagglutinin glycoproteins.Am J Vet Res. 1997 Aug;58(8):833-6. Am J Vet Res. 1997. PMID: 9256965
-
Humoral response and protection from experimental challenge following vaccination of raccoon pups with a modified-live canine distemper virus vaccine.J Wildl Dis. 1999 Jul;35(3):430-9. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-35.3.430. J Wildl Dis. 1999. PMID: 10479076
-
Canine distemper virus.Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2008 Jul;38(4):787-97, vii-viii. doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2008.02.007. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2008. PMID: 18501278 Review.
-
Safety and Immunogenicity of Morbillivirus canis Vaccines for Domestic and Wild Animals: A Scoping Review.Viruses. 2024 Jul 4;16(7):1078. doi: 10.3390/v16071078. Viruses. 2024. PMID: 39066240 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Development of a challenge-protective vaccine concept by modification of the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of canine distemper virus.J Virol. 2007 Dec;81(24):13649-58. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01385-07. Epub 2007 Sep 26. J Virol. 2007. PMID: 17898047 Free PMC article.
-
Canine Distemper Virus in Endangered Species: Species Jump, Clinical Variations, and Vaccination.Pathogens. 2022 Dec 29;12(1):57. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12010057. Pathogens. 2022. PMID: 36678405 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Viral Pathogenesis, Recombinant Vaccines, and Oncolytic Virotherapy: Applications of the Canine Distemper Virus Reverse Genetics System.Viruses. 2020 Mar 20;12(3):339. doi: 10.3390/v12030339. Viruses. 2020. PMID: 32244946 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Antiviral Screen against Canine Distemper Virus-Induced Membrane Fusion Activity.Viruses. 2021 Jan 18;13(1):128. doi: 10.3390/v13010128. Viruses. 2021. PMID: 33477492 Free PMC article.
-
Canine distemper spillover in domestic dogs from urban wildlife.Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2011 Nov;41(6):1069-86. doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2011.08.005. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2011. PMID: 22041204 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources