Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Apr;24(4):242-5.
doi: 10.1086/502207.

Colonization and infection with multiple nosocomial pathogens among patients colonized with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus

Affiliations

Colonization and infection with multiple nosocomial pathogens among patients colonized with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus

Curtis J Donskey et al. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To test the hypothesis that patients colonized with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) have a higher frequency of colonization or infection with other nosocomial pathogens than do patients who are not colonized with VRE.

Design: A rectal swab culture survey was conducted to determine the point-prevalence of stool colonization with ceftazidime-resistant gram-negative bacilli in hospitalized patients with or without VRE stool colonization. For a 6-month period, the frequency of Clostridium difficile diarrhea and isolation of antibiotic-resistant (ie, ceftazidime-, piperacillin/tazobactam-, levofloxacin-, or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole-resistant) gram-negative bacilli, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and non-albicans Candida species from clinical specimens other than stool was examined.

Setting: A Department of Veterans Affairs medical center.

Patients: All patients hospitalized in the acute care facility and one nursing home unit during a 1-week period in February 2001.

Results: VRE-colonized patients had a higher point-prevalence of rectal colonization with ceftazidime-resistant gram-negative bacilli than did patients not colonized with VRE (17% vs 4%; P = .026). During a 6-month period,the VRE-colonized patients were more likely to have Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (26% vs 2%; P = .001), MRSA infection (17% vs 4%; P = .017), or colonization or infection with gram-negative bacilli resistant to 4 different antibiotics.

Conclusion: VRE-colonized patients in our institution have a higher frequency of colonization or infection with other nosocomial pathogens than do patients who are not colonized with VRE. This suggests that isolation measures implemented to control VRE could help limit the dissemination of other, coexisting pathogens.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • More is more.
    Calfee DP. Calfee DP. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003 Apr;24(4):238-41. doi: 10.1086/502206. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003. PMID: 12725350 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources