Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2003 May 3;326(7396):956.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7396.956.

Cost effectiveness of ward based non-invasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: economic analysis of randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Cost effectiveness of ward based non-invasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: economic analysis of randomised controlled trial

P K Plant et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the cost effectiveness of standard treatment with and without the addition of ward based non-invasive ventilation in patients admitted to hospital with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Design: Incremental cost effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Medical wards in 14 hospitals in the United Kingdom.

Participants: The trial comprised 236 patients admitted to hospital with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and mild to moderate acidosis (pH 7.25-7.35) secondary to respiratory failure. The economic analysis compared the costs of treatment that these patients received after randomisation.

Main outcome measure: Incremental cost per in-hospital death.

Results: 24/118 died in the group receiving standard treatment and 12/118 in the group receiving non-invasive ventilation (P=0.05). Allocation to the group receiving non-invasive ventilation was associated with a reduction in costs of 49362 pounds sterling (78741 dollars; 73109 euros), mainly through reduced use of intensive care units. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio was -645 pounds sterling per death avoided (95% confidence interval -2310 pounds sterling to 386 pounds sterling), indicating a dominant (more effective and less costly) strategy. Modelling of these data indicates that a typical UK hospital providing a non-invasive ventilation service will avoid six deaths and three to nine admissions to intensive care units per year, with an associated cost reduction of 12000-53000 pounds sterling per year.

Conclusions: Non-invasive ventilation is a highly cost effective treatment that both reduced total costs and improved mortality in hospital.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Profile of randomised controlled trial of 236 patients in 14 centres in the United Kingdom

Comment in

References

    1. Brochard L, Mancebo J, Wysocki M, Lofaso F, Conti G, Rauss A, et al. Non-invasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:817–822. - PubMed
    1. Kramer N, Meyer TJ, Meharg J, Cece RD, Hill NS. Randomised, prospective trial of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;151:1799–1806. - PubMed
    1. Martin TJ, Hovis JD, Costantino JP, Bierman MI, Donahue MP, Rogers RM, et al. A randomised prospective evaluation of non-invasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161:807–813. - PubMed
    1. Celikel T, Sungur M, Ceyhan B, Karakurt S. Comparison of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation with standard medical therapy in hypercapnic acute respiratory failure. Chest. 1998;114:1636–1642. - PubMed
    1. Plant PK, Owen JL, Elliott MW. Early use of non-invasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on general respiratory wards: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2000;355:1931–1935. - PubMed

Publication types