Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Aug;32(8):446-53.
doi: 10.1007/s00256-003-0620-6. Epub 2003 May 3.

A radiographic comparative study of two series of skeletally mature clubfeet treated by two different protocols

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A radiographic comparative study of two series of skeletally mature clubfeet treated by two different protocols

E Ippolito et al. Skeletal Radiol. 2003 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the radiographic features of two series of congenital clubfeet to determine whether a different treatment protocol may influence the radiographic results at the end of skeletal growth.

Design and patients: Two series of patients with congenital clubfeet, treated by two different manipulative techniques and by two different complementary soft tissue release operations, were radiographically studied at skeletal maturity. Twenty-one normal feet of the unilateral cases in both series served as controls. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the feet were taken with the patient standing, and several radiographic parameters were studied.

Results and conclusions: The size of the talus and calcaneus and the height of the talar trochlea were smaller than normal in all cases of clubfeet, were similar in both series and were not influenced by treatment, whereas all the other radiographic parameters studied were more or less different between the two series and seemed to be influenced by treatment. In no treated clubfoot of either series was a normal radiographic foot anatomy restored, not even in those feet that had an excellent clinical result.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980 Jan;62(1):23-31 - PubMed
    1. J Pediatr Orthop. 1997 Jan-Feb;17(1):29-35 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974 Jan;56(1):57-62 - PubMed
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981 Oct;(160):30-42 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985 Nov;67(5):791-9 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources