Comparison of ultrasound and X-ray absorptiometry bone measurements in a case control study of female rheumatoid arthritis patients and randomly selected subjects in the population
- PMID: 12730749
- DOI: 10.1007/s00198-002-1365-0
Comparison of ultrasound and X-ray absorptiometry bone measurements in a case control study of female rheumatoid arthritis patients and randomly selected subjects in the population
Abstract
To compare quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) bone measurements in female rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and controls were randomly selected from the population; secondly, to examine disease and demographic factors associated with these bone measurements. In a total of 115 RA patients (mean age 63.0 years) and 115 age- and gender-matched controls demographic and clinical variables were collected and heel QUS parameters [speed of sound (SOS), broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and stiffness index (SI)] as well as DXA bone mineral density (BMD) at spine and hip were measured. The differences in QUS and DXA measurements between RA patients and controls were tested both on a group and on an individual level. Univariate and multivariate statistical tests were applied to explore for associations to the bone measurements. In the RA patients mean disease duration was 16.6 years, erythrocyte sedimentation rate 23.6 mm/h, M-HAQ 1.68, 28-swollen joint count 7.7, 18-deformed joint count 4.5, 50.0% were rheumatoid factor (RF) positive and 44.2% were current users of prednisolone. All bone measurements were reduced in RA patients compared with controls (SOS 1.9%, BUA 9.4%, SI 19.5%, femoral neck BMD 7.4%, total hip BMD 7.5%, spine L2-L4 BMD -3.0%). Only at spine was the BMD reduction not statistically significant ( P=0.21). In the subgroup of never users of prednisolone SOS was decreased by 1.4%, BUA by 3.7%, SI by 11.0, femoral neck BMD by 2.7%, and total hip BMD by 0.6%, whereas for spine L2-L4 BMD was increased by 4.3% and only for SOS and SI was the decrease statistically significant. The QUS discriminated better than DXA between patients and controls on a group level, but this difference in favor of QUS disappeared on an individual level when the measurement errors were taken into account. Age, BMI, RF and deformed joint count, but not corticosteroids, were independently associated with at least one of the QUS and one of the DXA measures; however, the association between disease-related variables was stronger with the QUS bone measures than with the DXA bone measures. The results for the quantitative QUS bone measures seem to mainly reflect bone mass. Disease-related variables in multivariate analysis remained independently associated with all QUS measures even when adjusting for DXA bone measures. Further studies are needed to examine if QUS may reflect other aspects than bone mass and be a potential better predictor for fracture risk in RA and corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis.
Similar articles
-
Does the combination of quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry improve fracture discrimination?Osteoporos Int. 2001;12(6):471-7. doi: 10.1007/s001980170092. Osteoporos Int. 2001. PMID: 11446563
-
A comparison of the longitudinal changes in quantitative ultrasound with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: the four-year effects of hormone replacement therapy.Osteoporos Int. 2000;11(1):52-8. doi: 10.1007/s001980050006. Osteoporos Int. 2000. PMID: 10663359
-
Quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the prediction of fragility fracture in men.Osteoporos Int. 2005 Aug;16(8):963-8. doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1771-6. Epub 2004 Dec 14. Osteoporos Int. 2005. PMID: 15599495
-
The role of quantitative ultrasound in the assessment of bone: a review.Clin Physiol. 1998 Jan;18(1):3-17. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2281.1998.00067.x. Clin Physiol. 1998. PMID: 9545615 Review.
-
Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) in the Management of Osteoporosis and Assessment of Fracture Risk.J Clin Densitom. 2017 Jul-Sep;20(3):322-333. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Jul 21. J Clin Densitom. 2017. PMID: 28739081 Review.
Cited by
-
Reduced trabecular bone mineral density and cortical thickness accompanied by increased outer bone circumference in metacarpal bone of rheumatoid arthritis patients: a cross-sectional study.Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12(3):R119. doi: 10.1186/ar3056. Epub 2010 Jun 21. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010. PMID: 20565921 Free PMC article.
-
Calcaneal Ultrasound Attenuation: Does the Region of Interest and Loading Influence the Repeatability of Measurement?Calcif Tissue Int. 2025 Mar 10;116(1):48. doi: 10.1007/s00223-025-01357-x. Calcif Tissue Int. 2025. PMID: 40063094 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical utilities of quantitative ultrasound in osteoporosis associated with inflammatory rheumatic diseases.Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2018 Feb;8(1):100-113. doi: 10.21037/qims.2018.02.02. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2018. PMID: 29541626 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Influence of inflammatory polyarthritis on quantitative heel ultrasound measurements.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Jul 26;13:133. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-133. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012. PMID: 22834652 Free PMC article.
-
[Bone densitometry in inflammatory rheumatic diseases : Characteristics of the measurement site and disease-specific factors].Z Rheumatol. 2009 Dec;68(10):845-50. doi: 10.1007/s00393-009-0502-y. Z Rheumatol. 2009. PMID: 19714343 Review. German.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous