Hospice use among Medicare managed care and fee-for-service patients dying with cancer
- PMID: 12734135
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.289.17.2238
Hospice use among Medicare managed care and fee-for-service patients dying with cancer
Abstract
Context: For most patients aged 65 years or older with cancer, hospice services are uniformly covered by Medicare. Hospice care is believed to improve care for patients at the end of life. However, few patients use hospice and others enroll too late to maximize the benefits of hospice services.
Objectives: Because type of insurance may affect use, we examined whether patients with Medicare managed care insurance enrolled in hospice earlier and had longer hospice stays than patients with Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) insurance.
Design and setting: Retrospective analysis of the last year of life using the Linked Medicare-Tumor Registry Database in 1 of 9 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program coverage areas.
Patients: A total of 260 090 Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 years or older diagnosed with first primary lung (n = 62 117), colorectal (n = 57 260), prostate (n = 59 826), female breast (n = 37 609), bladder (n = 19 598), pancreatic (n = 11 378), gastric (n = 9599), or liver (n = 2703) cancer between January 1, 1973, and December 31, 1996, and who died between January 1, 1988, and December 31, 1998.
Main outcome measures: Time from diagnosis to hospice entry and hospice length of stay for patients enrolled in FFS vs managed care plans after adjusting for patient demographics, tumor registry, year of hospice entry, and type and cancer stage.
Results: Of the 260 090 patients, most were men (59%), white (85%), and enrolled in FFS (89.7%). Only 54 937 patients (21.1%) received hospice care before death. Hospice use varied by type of primary cancer ranging from 31.8% of patients with pancreatic cancer to 15.6% with bladder cancer. Managed care patients were more likely to use hospice than FFS patients (32.4% vs 19.8%, P<.001). Among hospice patients, median (interquartile range) length of stay was longer for managed care vs FFS patients (32 days [11-82] vs 25 days [9-66], P<.001). After adjustment, managed care patients had higher rates of hospice enrollment (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% CI, 1.35-1.42) and had a longer length of stay (adjusted HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.88-0.94) vs FFS patients. Managed care patients were less likely to enroll in hospice within 7 days of their death (18.6% vs 22.6%, P<.001) and somewhat more likely to enroll in hospice more than 180 days before death (7.8% vs 6.1%, P<.001); the results for each of the 8 cancer diagnoses were similar. Hospice enrollment and length of stay among managed care vs FFS patients differed significantly by region.
Conclusion: Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in managed care had consistently higher rates of hospice use and significantly longer hospice stays than those enrolled in FFS. Although these differences may reflect patient and family preferences, our findings raise the possibility that some managed care plans are more successful at facilitating or encouraging hospice use for patients dying with cancer.
Comment in
-
Hospice use in Medicare beneficiaries with cancer.JAMA. 2003 Sep 24;290(12):1578; author reply 1578-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.12.1578-b. JAMA. 2003. PMID: 14506113 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Hospice use in Medicare managed care and fee-for-service systems.Am J Manag Care. 2001 Aug;7(8):777-86. Am J Manag Care. 2001. PMID: 11519237
-
Barriers to hospice care among older patients dying with lung and colorectal cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2003 Feb 15;21(4):728-35. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.06.142. J Clin Oncol. 2003. PMID: 12586813
-
Place of Death of Individuals with Terminal Cancer: New Insights from Medicare Hospice Place-of-Service Codes.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Sep;64(9):1815-22. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14269. Epub 2016 Aug 18. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016. PMID: 27534517
-
Relationship between insurance and 30-day readmission rates in patients 65 years and older discharged from an acute care hospital with hospice services.J Hosp Med. 2016 Oct;11(10):688-693. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2613. Epub 2016 May 25. J Hosp Med. 2016. PMID: 27222206 Review.
-
Updated Overview of the SEER-Medicare Data: Enhanced Content and Applications.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2020 May 1;2020(55):3-13. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgz029. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2020. PMID: 32412076 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Trends in Timing of Dialysis Initiation within Versus Outside the Department of Veterans Affairs.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Aug 7;10(8):1418-27. doi: 10.2215/CJN.12731214. Epub 2015 Jul 23. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015. PMID: 26206891 Free PMC article.
-
The dartmouth atlas applied to kaiser permanente: analysis of variation in care at the end of life.Perm J. 2008 Winter;12(1):4-9. doi: 10.7812/tpp/07-120. Perm J. 2008. PMID: 21369505 Free PMC article.
-
A standardized relative resource cost model for medical care: application to cancer control programs.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2013;2013(46):106-16. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgt002. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2013. PMID: 23962514 Free PMC article.
-
Half of older Americans seen in emergency department in last month of life; most admitted to hospital, and many die there.Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Jun;31(6):1277-85. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0922. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012. PMID: 22665840 Free PMC article.
-
Hospice care and survival among elderly patients with lung cancer.J Palliat Med. 2011 Aug;14(8):929-39. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0522. Epub 2011 Jul 18. J Palliat Med. 2011. PMID: 21767153 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical